These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289303)
1. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Guala F Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The restorative logic of punishment: another argument in favor of weak selection. Baumard N Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 22289306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Punishment leads to cooperative behavior in structured societies. Shutters ST Evol Comput; 2012; 20(2):301-19. PubMed ID: 22171813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild. Guala F Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 22393582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Rockenbach B; Milinski M Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7120):718-23. PubMed ID: 17151660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolutionary game theory meets social science: is there a unifying rule for human cooperation? Rosas A J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):450-6. PubMed ID: 20167223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The strategic logic of costly punishment necessitates natural field experiments, and at least one such experiment exists. Johnson T Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 22289321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The punishment that sustains cooperation is often coordinated and costly. Bowles S; Boyd R; Mathew S; Richerson PJ Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 22289309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Panchanathan K; Boyd R Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):499-502. PubMed ID: 15565153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power and corruption. Úbeda F; Duéñez-Guzmán EA Evolution; 2011 Apr; 65(4):1127-39. PubMed ID: 21091468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Boyd R; Gintis H; Bowles S Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5978):617-20. PubMed ID: 20431013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The social structure of cooperation and punishment. Gintis H; Fehr E Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is strong reciprocity really strong in the lab, let alone in the real world? Güney Ş; Newell BR Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):29. PubMed ID: 22289318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dispositional free riders do not free ride on punishment. Weber TO; Weisel O; Gächter S Nat Commun; 2018 Jun; 9(1):2390. PubMed ID: 29921863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: punishing for reputation rather than cooperation. Shaw A; Santos L Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39. PubMed ID: 22289329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reciprocity and uncertainty. Bereby-Meyer Y Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 22289307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Towards a unified theory of reciprocity. Rosas A Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 22289326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A test of the strong reciprocity model: relationship between cooperation and punishment]. Li Y; Yamagishi T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Apr; 85(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24804436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]