561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289303)
1. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.
Guala F
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The restorative logic of punishment: another argument in favor of weak selection.
Baumard N
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 22289306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Punishment leads to cooperative behavior in structured societies.
Shutters ST
Evol Comput; 2012; 20(2):301-19. PubMed ID: 22171813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild.
Guala F
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 22393582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment.
Rockenbach B; Milinski M
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7120):718-23. PubMed ID: 17151660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment.
Casari M
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 22289310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolutionary game theory meets social science: is there a unifying rule for human cooperation?
Rosas A
J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):450-6. PubMed ID: 20167223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The strategic logic of costly punishment necessitates natural field experiments, and at least one such experiment exists.
Johnson T
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 22289321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The punishment that sustains cooperation is often coordinated and costly.
Bowles S; Boyd R; Mathew S; Richerson PJ
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 22289309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.
Panchanathan K; Boyd R
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):499-502. PubMed ID: 15565153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power and corruption.
Úbeda F; Duéñez-Guzmán EA
Evolution; 2011 Apr; 65(4):1127-39. PubMed ID: 21091468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare.
Boyd R; Gintis H; Bowles S
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5978):617-20. PubMed ID: 20431013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The social structure of cooperation and punishment.
Gintis H; Fehr E
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is strong reciprocity really strong in the lab, let alone in the real world?
Güney Ş; Newell BR
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):29. PubMed ID: 22289318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dispositional free riders do not free ride on punishment.
Weber TO; Weisel O; Gächter S
Nat Commun; 2018 Jun; 9(1):2390. PubMed ID: 29921863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: punishing for reputation rather than cooperation.
Shaw A; Santos L
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39. PubMed ID: 22289329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reciprocity and uncertainty.
Bereby-Meyer Y
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 22289307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Towards a unified theory of reciprocity.
Rosas A
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 22289326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A test of the strong reciprocity model: relationship between cooperation and punishment].
Li Y; Yamagishi T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2014 Apr; 85(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24804436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
