138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289307)
1. Reciprocity and uncertainty.
Bereby-Meyer Y
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 22289307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The strategic logic of costly punishment necessitates natural field experiments, and at least one such experiment exists.
Johnson T
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 22289321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lab support for strong reciprocity is weak: punishing for reputation rather than cooperation.
Shaw A; Santos L
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39. PubMed ID: 22289329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strong reciprocity is not uncommon in the "wild".
Runciman WG
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22289328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The social structure of cooperation and punishment.
Gintis H; Fehr E
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 22289317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retaliation and antisocial punishment are overlooked in many theoretical models as well as behavioral experiments.
Dreber A; Rand DG
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):24. PubMed ID: 22289313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives from ethnography on weak and strong reciprocity.
Wiessner P
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 22289335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is strong reciprocity really strong in the lab, let alone in the real world?
Güney Ş; Newell BR
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):29. PubMed ID: 22289318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Culture: the missing piece in theories of weak and strong reciprocity.
Read D
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 22289325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In medio stat virtus: theoretical and methodological extremes regarding reciprocity will not explain complex social behaviors.
Civai C; Langus A
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 22289311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.
Guala F
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild.
Guala F
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 22393582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment.
Casari M
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 22289310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximate and ultimate causes of punishment and strong reciprocity.
Barclay P
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 22289305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Punishing for your own good: the case of reputation-based cooperation.
Tennie C
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 22289331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The restorative logic of punishment: another argument in favor of weak selection.
Baumard N
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 22289306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards a unified theory of reciprocity.
Rosas A
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 22289326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blood, sex, personality, power, and altruism: factors influencing the validity of strong reciprocity.
Ferguson E; Corr P
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 22289315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What we need is theory of human cooperation (and meta-analysis) to bridge the gap between the lab and the wild.
Van Lange PA; Balliet DP; IJzerman H
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 22289332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In the lab and the field: punishment is rare in equilibrium.
Gächter S
Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 22289316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
