These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289361)

  • 21. Kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments: effect of geochemical conditions and model evaluation.
    Liu C; Shi Z; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6560-6. PubMed ID: 19764217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bio-monitoring for uranium using stream-side terrestrial plants and macrophytes.
    Caldwell EF; Duff MC; Ferguson CE; Coughlin DP; Hicks RA; Dixon E
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Mar; 14(3):968-76. PubMed ID: 22318309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Location, identification, and size distribution of depleted uranium grains in reservoir sediments.
    Lo D; Fleischer RL; Albert EA; Arnason JG
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 89(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 16806609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Origin and transport of (238)U and (226)Ra in riverine, estuarine and marine sediments of the Krka River, Croatia.
    Cukrov N; Mlakar M; Cuculić V; Barisić D
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jun; 100(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 19362398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Linearity and reversibility of iodide adsorption on sediments from Hanford, Washington under water saturated conditions.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Krupka KM
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2009-16. PubMed ID: 15087181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advective removal of intraparticle uranium from contaminated vadose zone sediments, Hanford, U.S.
    Ilton ES; Qafoku NP; Liu C; Moore DA; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Mar; 42(5):1565-71. PubMed ID: 18441804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in uranium speciation through a depth sequence of contaminated Hanford sediments.
    Catalano JG; McKinley JP; Zachara JM; Heald SM; Smith SC; Brown GE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Apr; 40(8):2517-24. PubMed ID: 16683586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-Area Savannah River Site.
    Dong W; Tokunaga TK; Davis JA; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1565-71. PubMed ID: 22191402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of a disused mine on uranium transport in the River Fal, South West England.
    Moliner-Martinez Y; Campíns-Falcó P; Worsfold PJ; Keith-Roach MJ
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Nov; 6(11):907-13. PubMed ID: 15536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sediment properties influencing the bioavailability of uranium to Chironomus dilutus larvae in spiked field sediments.
    Crawford SE; Liber K
    Chemosphere; 2016 Apr; 148():77-85. PubMed ID: 26802266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating Pu and U isotopic compositions in sediments: a case study in Lake Obuchi, Rokkasho Village, Japan using sector-field ICP-MS and ICP-QMS.
    Zheng J; Yamada M
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Aug; 7(8):792-7. PubMed ID: 16049580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of surface area normalisation for interpreting distribution coefficients (K(d)) for uranium sorption.
    Payne TE; Brendler V; Comarmond MJ; Nebelung C
    J Environ Radioact; 2011 Oct; 102(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 20452709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uranium phases in contaminated sediments below Hanford's U tank farm.
    Um W; Wang Z; Serne RJ; Williams BD; Brown CF; Dodge CJ; Francis AJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4280-6. PubMed ID: 19603635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterization of uranium and plutonium containing particles originating from the nuclear weapons accident in Thule, Greenland, 1968.
    Lind OC; Salbu B; Janssens K; Proost K; Dahlgaard H
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 81(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 15748658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Uranium release from sediment to groundwater: influence of water chemistry and insights into release mechanisms.
    Alam MS; Cheng T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():72-87. PubMed ID: 24954631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of saline waste solution infiltration rates on uranium retention and spatial distribution in Hanford sediments.
    Wan J; Tokunaga TK; Kim Y; Wang Z; Lanzirotti A; Saiz E; Serne RJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Mar; 42(6):1973-8. PubMed ID: 18409623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phosphate controls uranium release from acidic waste-weathered Hanford sediments.
    Vázquez-Ortega A; Perdrial N; Reinoso-Maset E; Root RA; O'Day PA; Chorover J
    J Hazard Mater; 2021 Aug; 416():126240. PubMed ID: 34492991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of the different source terms of natural radionuclides in a river affected by NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials) activities.
    Baeza A; Corbacho JA; Guillén J; Salas A; Mora JC
    Chemosphere; 2011 May; 83(7):933-40. PubMed ID: 21435688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Study of sorption-retarded U(VI) diffusion in Hanford silt/clay material.
    Bai J; Liu C; Ball WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7706-11. PubMed ID: 19921882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Behaviour and mobility of U and Ra in sediments near an abandoned uranium mine, Cornwall, UK.
    Siddeeg SM; Bryan ND; Livens FR
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jan; 17(1):235-45. PubMed ID: 25503245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.