173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289507)
1. Non-conscious word processing in a mirror-masking paradigm causing attentional distraction: an ERP-study.
Hollenstein M; Koenig T; Kubat M; Blaser D; Perrig WJ
Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):353-65. PubMed ID: 22289507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociation of conscious and unconscious repetition priming effect on event-related potentials.
Matsumoto A; Iidaka T; Nomura M; Ohira H
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1168-76. PubMed ID: 15817175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink.
Sergent C; Baillet S; Dehaene S
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1391-400. PubMed ID: 16158062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process.
Deacon D; Hewitt S; Yang C; Nagata M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2000 Mar; 9(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10729697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The neural manifestation of the word concreteness effect: an electrical neuroimaging study.
Adorni R; Proverbio AM
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):880-91. PubMed ID: 22313624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotion and attention in visual word processing: an ERP study.
Kissler J; Herbert C; Winkler I; Junghofer M
Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 18439739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm.
Kiefer M; Brendel D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 16494680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intact subliminal processing and delayed conscious access in multiple sclerosis.
Reuter F; Del Cul A; Audoin B; Malikova I; Naccache L; Ranjeva JP; Lyon-Caen O; Ali Chérif A; Cohen L; Dehaene S; Pelletier J
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Sep; 45(12):2683-91. PubMed ID: 17517425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental aspects of automatic word processing: language lateralization of early ERP components in children, young adults and middle-aged subjects.
Spironelli C; Angrilli A
Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 18343558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal dynamics of access to consciousness in the attentional blink.
Kranczioch C; Debener S; Maye A; Engel AK
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):947-55. PubMed ID: 17629501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing.
Ruz M; Nobre AC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 20(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 18345981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study.
Rosazza C; Cai Q; Minati L; Paulignan Y; Nazir TA
Brain Res; 2009 May; 1272():32-44. PubMed ID: 19332032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
Matthews AJ; Martin FH
Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Independence of visual awareness from the scope of attention: an electrophysiological study.
Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Lehtonen M
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 15958780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and postperceptual selection during the attentional blink.
Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Elliott JC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2005-18. PubMed ID: 17892389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Reiss JE; Hoffman JE
Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1015-20. PubMed ID: 17201780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Cornett L; Goodin Z; Allen PA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):751-73. PubMed ID: 18505335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
