BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289541)

  • 41. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.
    Pak F; Kanan HR; Alikhassi A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Nov; 122(2):89-107. PubMed ID: 26206406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques.
    Verma B; Zakos J
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2001 Mar; 5(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11300216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hybrid fuzzy cluster ensemble framework for tumor clustering from biomolecular data.
    Yu Z; Chen H; You J; Han G; Li L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):657-70. PubMed ID: 24091399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography.
    Keller B; Nathan D; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee J; Conant E; Kontos D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 3):562-9. PubMed ID: 22003744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Integration of fuzzy logic and structure tensor towards mammogram contrast enhancement.
    Jiang J; Yao B; Wason AM
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Jan; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15710543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Application of Semi-supervised Fuzzy Clustering Based on Knowledge Weighting and Cluster Center Learning to Mammary Molybdenum Target Image Segmentation.
    Peng P; Wu D; Huang LJ; Wang J; Zhang L; Wu Y; Jiang Y; Lu Z; Lai KW; Xia K
    Interdiscip Sci; 2024 Mar; 16(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 37486420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.
    Haygood TM; Arribas E; Brennan PC; Atkinson EN; Herndon M; Dieber J; Geiser W; Santiago L; Mills CM; Davis P; Adrada B; Carkaci S; Stephens TW; Whitman GJ
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17. PubMed ID: 19896068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Segmentation algorithms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Bankman IN; Nizialek T; Simon I; Gatewood OB; Weinberg IN; Brody WR
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Jun; 1(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 11020816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Halkiotis S; Mantas J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():24-9. PubMed ID: 15460655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ipsilateral-mammogram computer-aided detection of breast cancer.
    Sun X; Qian W; Song D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Apr; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 15081498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multi-View Probabilistic Classification of Breast Microcalcifications.
    Bekker AJ; Shalhon M; Greenspan H; Goldberger J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Feb; 35(2):645-53. PubMed ID: 26452277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection.
    Vyborny CJ; Doi T; O'Shaughnessy KF; Romsdahl HM; Schneider AC; Stein AA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 10831688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Computerized decision support system for mass identification in breast using digital mammogram: a study on GA-based neuro-fuzzy approaches.
    Das A; Bhattacharya M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():523-33. PubMed ID: 21431593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
    Bhothisuwan W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computer aided decision system for early detection of breast cancer.
    Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
    Indian J Med Res; 2006 Aug; 124(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 17015928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; PatiƱo JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.