These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22290125)

  • 1. Bioabsorbable interference screw versus bioabsorbable cross pins: influence of femoral graft fixation on the clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.
    Frosch S; Rittstieg A; Balcarek P; Walde TA; Schüttrumpf JP; Wachowski MM; Stürmer KM; Frosch KH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Nov; 20(11):2251-6. PubMed ID: 22290125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intratunnel versus extratunnel autologous hamstring double-bundle graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 2 femoral fixation procedures.
    Ibrahim SA; Abdul Ghafar S; Marwan Y; Mahgoub AM; Al Misfer A; Farouk H; Wagdy M; Alherran H; Khirait S
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 25349264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Debieux P; Franciozi CE; Lenza M; Tamaoki MJ; Magnussen RA; Faloppa F; Belloti JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 7(7):CD009772. PubMed ID: 27450741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with reverse "Y"-plasty grafts and fixation in the femur with either a bioabsorbable interference screw or an Endobutton.
    Ping LW; Bin S; Rui Y; Yang S; Zheng ZZ; Yue D
    Knee; 2012 Mar; 19(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 21159514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross Pin Versus Interference Screw for Femoral Graft Fixation in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
    Hu B; Shen W; Zhou C; Meng J; Wu H; Yan S
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Feb; 34(2):615-623. PubMed ID: 29066266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical results of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of femoral knot/press-fit fixation and interference screw fixation.
    Ho WP; Lee CH; Huang CH; Chen CH; Chuang TY
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Jul; 30(7):823-32. PubMed ID: 24768467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-Year Follow-up.
    Arama Y; Salmon LJ; Sri-Ram K; Linklater J; Roe JP; Pinczewski LA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1893-901. PubMed ID: 26109611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.
    Nebelung S; Deitmer G; Gebing R; Reichwein F; Nebelung W
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Nov; 20(11):2279-86. PubMed ID: 22392067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis autografts: a comparison between bioabsorbable screws and bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation.
    Volpi P; Marinoni L; Bait C; Galli M; de Girolamo L
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 19218557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between a novel human cortical bone screw and bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation of ACL reconstruction.
    Shen XZ; Qu F; Li CB; Qi W; Lu X; Li HL; Guo Q; Wang JT; Zhao G; Liu YJ
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2018 Jul; 22(1 Suppl):111-118. PubMed ID: 30004555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Ahn JH; Park JS; Lee YS; Cho YJ
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 17916475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Poly-L-Lactic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Bioabsorbable Screws for Tibial Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results.
    Lee DW; Lee JW; Kim SB; Park JH; Chung KS; Ha JK; Kim JG; Kim WJ
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Sep; 9(3):270-279. PubMed ID: 28861193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized prospective controlled study with 5-year follow-up of cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Björkman P; Sandelin J; Harilainen A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Aug; 23(8):2353-2359. PubMed ID: 24832696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using RigidFix compared with extracortical fixation.
    Lopes OV; de Freitas Spinelli L; Leite LHC; Buzzeto BQ; Saggin PRF; Kuhn A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 May; 25(5):1591-1597. PubMed ID: 26614426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.
    Kaeding C; Farr J; Kavanaugh T; Pedroza A
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 15689862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.
    Chiang ER; Chen KH; Chih-Chang Lin A; Wang ST; Wu HT; Ma HL; Chang MC; Liu CL; Chen TH
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Feb; 35(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 30712629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study.
    Capuano L; Hardy P; Longo UG; Denaro V; Maffulli N
    Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 18367398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone tunnel widening with autogenous bone plugs versus bioabsorbable interference screws for secondary fixation in ACL reconstruction.
    Kim SJ; Bae JH; Song SH; Lim HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jan; 95(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23324957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study.
    Moisala AS; Järvelä T; Paakkala A; Paakkala T; Kannus P; Järvinen M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Dec; 16(12):1080-6. PubMed ID: 18762911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.
    Boutsiadis A; Panisset JC; Devitt BM; Mauris F; Barthelemy R; Barth J
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 30015501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.