173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22290248)
1. 256-MSCT image acquisition with sequential axial scans: evaluation of image quality and resolution in a phantom study.
Klink T; Nagel H; Schwartz B; Regier M; Adam G; Begemann PG
Rofo; 2012 Mar; 184(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 22290248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical evaluation of the weighted Feldkamp algorithms applied to the 256-detector row CT scanner for volumetric cine imaging.
Mori S; Endo M; Kondo C; Tanada S
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 16679272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.
Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of the modulation transfer function of digitally reconstructed radiographs in radiotherapy treatment planning using a point phantom.
Kirwin SL; Langmack KA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):N251-5. PubMed ID: 16204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.
Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of accelerated iterative x-ray CT image reconstruction using floating point graphics hardware.
Kole JS; Beekman FJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):875-89. PubMed ID: 16467584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm.
Christner JA; Stierstorfer K; Primak AN; Eusemann CD; Flohr TG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):897-906. PubMed ID: 20229899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the quantitative capability of a home-made cone-beam micro computed tomography system.
Chueh HS; Tsai WK; Fu HM; Chen JC
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006; 30(6-7):349-55. PubMed ID: 17067784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.
Watanabe H; Honda E; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 19819091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accelerating image acquisition in 64-MDCT: the influence of scan parameters on image resolution and quality in a phantom study.
Klink T; Regier M; van Stevendaal U; Grass M; Adam G; Begemann P
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22726972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Alves F; Missbach-Guentner J; Grabbe E; Heuser M
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17189841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the z-flying focal spot on resolution and artifact behavior for a 64-slice spiral CT scanner.
Kyriakou Y; Kachelriess M; Knaup M; Krause JU; Kalender WA
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jun; 16(6):1206-15. PubMed ID: 16541229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study.
Farshad-Amacker NA; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T
Acad Radiol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):1234-9. PubMed ID: 24029055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study.
Dikkers R; Greuter MJ; Kristanto W; van Ooijen PM; Sijens PE; Willems TP; Oudkerk M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18308496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.
Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Brody AS; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
Acad Radiol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):1152-61. PubMed ID: 23931430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT.
Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6969-89. PubMed ID: 18029988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation.
Engelken FJ; Lembcke A; Hamm B; Dewey M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 19124110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
