162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22292146)
1. Treatment of gingival recession defects with xenogenic collagen matrix: a histologic report.
Camelo M; Nevins M; Nevins ML; Schupbach P; Kim DM
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 22292146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and histological evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix allograft in combination with the coronally advanced flap in the treatment of Miller class I recession defects: an experimental study in the mini-pig.
Núñez J; Caffesse R; Vignoletti F; Guerra F; San Roman F; Sanz M
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19508251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report.
Majzoub Z; Landi L; Grusovin MG; Cordioli G
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1607-15. PubMed ID: 11759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cellular dermal matrix used for root coverage: 18-month follow-up observation.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 12019711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Creeping attachment associated with the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1997 Sep; 68(9):890-9. PubMed ID: 9379335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Grisi MF; Souza SL; Taba MJ; Palioto DB
J Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 75(10):1350-6. PubMed ID: 15562912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of local anatomy on the outcome of treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions.
Santamaria MP; Ambrosano GM; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 81(7):1027-34. PubMed ID: 20214443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
