248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22292532)
1. Working memory predicts the rejection of false memories.
Leding JK
Memory; 2012; 20(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 22292532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in working memory capacity affect false memories for missing aspects of events.
Gerrie MP; Garry M
Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):561-71. PubMed ID: 17613798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
Unsworth N
Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
Aslan A; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Watson JM; Bunting MF; Poole BJ; Conway AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15641906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
Unsworth N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
Broadway JM; Engle RW
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
Ries M; Marks W
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories.
Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Brewer GA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2411-25. PubMed ID: 23679085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Need for cognition is related to the rejection (but not the acceptance) of false memories.
Leding JK
Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23505954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elevated cortisol at retrieval suppresses false memories in parallel with correct memories.
Diekelmann S; Wilhelm I; Wagner U; Born J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 20465357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
Miller AL; Unsworth N
Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
Kawasaki Y; Yama H
Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.
Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 20053060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach.
Marevic I; Arnold NR; Rummel J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 28326968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Affective valence influences participant's susceptibility to false memories and illusory recollection.
Dehon H; Larøi F; Van der Linden M
Emotion; 2010 Oct; 10(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 21038946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Variations of encoding and false memories in recall].
Corson Y; Mahé A; Verrier N; Colombel et Luc Jagot F
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 21728403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: the role of working memory capacity.
Meinz EJ; Hambrick DZ
Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):914-9. PubMed ID: 20534780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
