237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22294365)
1. Static biofilm cultures of Gram-positive pathogens grown in a microtiter format used for anti-biofilm drug discovery.
Kwasny SM; Opperman TJ
Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2010 Sep; Chapter 13():Unit 13A.8. PubMed ID: 22294365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay.
O'Toole GA
J Vis Exp; 2011 Jan; (47):. PubMed ID: 21307833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining conditions for biofilm inhibition and eradication assays for Gram-positive clinical reference strains.
Cruz CD; Shah S; Tammela P
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):173. PubMed ID: 30390625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biofilm Formation and Quantification Using the 96-Microtiter Plate.
Thibeaux R; Kainiu M; Goarant C
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2134():207-214. PubMed ID: 32632872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying implant-associated biofilms: Comparison of microscopic, microbiologic and biochemical methods.
Doll K; Jongsthaphongpun KL; Stumpp NS; Winkel A; Stiesch M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():61-68. PubMed ID: 27444546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microtiter plate assays to assess antibiofilm activity against bacteria.
Haney EF; Trimble MJ; Hancock REW
Nat Protoc; 2021 May; 16(5):2615-2632. PubMed ID: 33911258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the impact of cultivation conditions and peg surface modification on the
Diepoltová A; Konečná K; Janďourek O; Nachtigal P
J Med Microbiol; 2021 May; 70(5):. PubMed ID: 34048334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new device for rapid evaluation of biofilm formation potential by bacteria.
Chavant P; Gaillard-Martinie B; Talon R; Hébraud M; Bernardi T
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 17218029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies and Approaches for Discovery of Small Molecule Disruptors of Biofilm Physiology.
Trebino MA; Shingare RD; MacMillan JB; Yildiz FH
Molecules; 2021 Jul; 26(15):. PubMed ID: 34361735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecology of mixed biofilms subjected daily to a chlorinated alkaline solution: spatial distribution of bacterial species suggests a protective effect of one species to another.
Leriche V; Briandet R; Carpentier B
Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 12542714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Cassat JE; Lee CY; Smeltzer MS
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 391():127-44. PubMed ID: 18025674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method.
Sabaeifard P; Abdi-Ali A; Soudi MR; Dinarvand R
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Oct; 105():134-40. PubMed ID: 25086178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by antibiotics in 96-Microtiter Well Plates and Drip Flow Reactors: critical factors influencing outcomes.
Manner S; Goeres DM; Skogman M; Vuorela P; Fallarero A
Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():43854. PubMed ID: 28252025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An image-based 384-well high-throughput screening method for the discovery of biofilm inhibitors in Vibrio cholerae.
Peach KC; Bray WM; Shikuma NJ; Gassner NC; Lokey RS; Yildiz FH; Linington RG
Mol Biosyst; 2011 Apr; 7(4):1176-84. PubMed ID: 21246108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotic and abiotic substrates for enhancing Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation: New approach using extracellular matrix and slanted coverslip technique.
Ramalingam K; Lee V
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2019 May; 65(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 30224574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening.
Harrison JJ; Stremick CA; Turner RJ; Allan ND; Olson ME; Ceri H
Nat Protoc; 2010 Jul; 5(7):1236-54. PubMed ID: 20595953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates.
Hassan A; Usman J; Kaleem F; Omair M; Khalid A; Iqbal M
Braz J Infect Dis; 2011; 15(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 21860999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation.
Stepanovic S; Vukovic D; Dakic I; Savic B; Svabic-Vlahovic M
J Microbiol Methods; 2000 Apr; 40(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 10699673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of DNase and antibiotics on biofilm characteristics.
Tetz GV; Artemenko NK; Tetz VV
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2009 Mar; 53(3):1204-9. PubMed ID: 19064900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A semi-quantitative approach to assess biofilm formation using wrinkled colony development.
Ray VA; Morris AR; Visick KL
J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):e4035. PubMed ID: 22710417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
