These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Guide extension and optical coherence tomography, a new approach to study aorto-ostial coronary lesions: a case report. Dadkhah R; Ungureanu C Eur Heart J Case Rep; 2024 Jan; 8(1):ytad624. PubMed ID: 38145109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissection-like appearance of focal catheter-induced vasospasm in intracoronary optical coherence tomography. Volleberg R; Damman P; van Royen N Eur Heart J; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38669048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention for optimizing outcomes. Mehrotra S; Mishra S; Paramasivam G Indian Heart J; 2018 Dec; 70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S456-S465. PubMed ID: 30595307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical coherence tomography as a tool for percutaneous coronary interventions. Diaz-Sandoval LJ; Bouma BE; Tearney GJ; Jang IK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Aug; 65(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 15920721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical coherence tomography at follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: relationship between procedural dissections, stent strut malapposition and stent healing. Radu M; Jørgensen E; Kelbæk H; Helqvist S; Skovgaard L; Saunamäki K EuroIntervention; 2011 Jul; 7(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 21729838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time-domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion. Takarada S; Imanishi T; Liu Y; Ikejima H; Tsujioka H; Kuroi A; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Kitabata H; Kubo T; Nakamura N; Hirata K; Tanaka A; Mizukoshi M; Akasaka T Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 19937788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]