123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22296366)
1. A qualitative study of Japanese patients' perspectives on post-treatment care for gynecological cancer.
Oshima S; Kisa K; Terashita T; Habara M; Kawabata H; Maezawa M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(9):2255-61. PubMed ID: 22296366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Care-seeking behavior of Japanese gynecological cancer survivors suffering from adverse effects.
Oshima S; Kisa K; Terashita T; Kawabata H; Maezawa M
BMC Womens Health; 2013 Jan; 13():1. PubMed ID: 23295104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gynecological cancer patients' attitudes toward follow-up care after cancer treatment: Do preferences reflect patients' experience? A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Fidjeland HL; Brekke M; Stokstad T; Vistad I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 29893058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) intervention for women with breast or gynecological cancer.
Maheu C; Lebel S; Courbasson C; Lefebvre M; Singh M; Bernstein LJ; Muraca L; Benea A; Jolicoeur L; Harris C; Ramanakumar AV; Ferguson S; Sidani S
BMC Cancer; 2016 Apr; 16():291. PubMed ID: 27112319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer - time for a change?
Vistad I; Moy BW; Salvesen HB; Liavaag AH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Jul; 90(7):707-18. PubMed ID: 21382018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of migrant background on patient preference and expectations in breast and gynecological malignancies (NOGGO-expression V study): results of a prospective multicentre study in 606 patients in Germany.
Dimitrova D; Naghavi B; Richter R; Nasser S; Chekerov R; Braicu EI; David M; Blohmer J; Inci G; Torsten U; Oskay-Özcelik G; Blau I; Fersis N; Holzgreve A; Keil E; Keller M; Keilholz U; Sehouli J
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1018. PubMed ID: 34511112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes of patients with gynecological and breast cancer toward integration of complementary medicine in cancer care.
Ben-Arye E; Schiff E; Steiner M; Keshet Y; Lavie O
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 21912265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paradoxes of follow-up - health professionals' views on follow-up after surgical treatment in gynecological cancer.
Dahl L; Wittrup I; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Væggemose U
Acta Oncol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 25017380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contributions of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) in Improving the Quality of Life in Women With Gynecological Malignancies.
Futagami M; Yokoyama Y; Shimada M; Sato S; Miyagi E; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Fujimura M; Aoki Y; Sagae S; Sugiyama T
Curr Oncol Rep; 2017 Apr; 19(4):25. PubMed ID: 28303492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
Rees S; Williams A
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A focus group study exploring gynecological cancer survivors' experiences and perceptions of participating in a RCT testing the efficacy of a home-based physical activity intervention.
Donnelly CM; Lowe-Strong A; Rankin JP; Campbell A; Blaney JM; Gracey JH
Support Care Cancer; 2013 Jun; 21(6):1697-708. PubMed ID: 23321934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Living in a changed female body after gynecological cancer.
Sekse RJ; Gjengedal E; Råheim M
Health Care Women Int; 2013; 34(1):14-33. PubMed ID: 23216094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Professionals' and patients' views of routine follow-up: a questionnaire survey.
Kew FM; Galaal K; Manderville H; Verleye L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 17504372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A feasibility study of a psychoeducational intervention program for gynecological cancer patients.
Chow KM; Chan CW; Chan JC; Choi KK; Siu KY
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2014 Aug; 18(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 24793004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Explicit prognostic disclosure to Asian women with breast cancer: A randomized, scripted video-vignette study (J-SUPPORT1601).
Mori M; Fujimori M; van Vliet LM; Yamaguchi T; Shimizu C; Kinoshita T; Morishita-Kawahara M; Inoue A; Inoguchi H; Matsuoka Y; Bruera E; Morita T; Uchitomi Y
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(19):3320-3329. PubMed ID: 31206639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gynecologic cancer patients' psychosocial needs and their views on the physician's role in meeting those needs.
Miller BE; Pittman B; Strong C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12657109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow-up of gynecological cancer patients after treatment - the views of European experts in gynecologic oncology.
Vistad I; Cvancarova M; Salvesen HB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Nov; 91(11):1286-92. PubMed ID: 22880840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Busolo D; Woodgate R
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telephone follow-up after treatment for endometrial cancer: A qualitative study of patients' and clinical nurse specialists' experiences in the ENDCAT trial.
Williamson S; Beaver K; Gardner A; Martin-Hirsch P
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Jun; 34():61-67. PubMed ID: 29784140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.
Koffman J; Yorganci E; Murtagh F; Yi D; Gao W; Barclay S; Pickles A; Higginson I; Johnson H; Wilson R; Bailey S; Ewart C; Evans C
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(55):1-150. PubMed ID: 31594555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
