These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2229674)
21. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study. Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Narrow-band analysis of compound action potentials for several stimulus conditions in the guinea pig. Prijs VF; Eggermont JJ Hear Res; 1981 Mar; 4(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 7204260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Feb; 63(2):524-32. PubMed ID: 670549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals. Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity. Carlier E; Pujol R Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Auditory nerve neurophonic tuning curves produced by masking of round window responses. Henry KR Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):167-76. PubMed ID: 9119760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Growth of suppression in the cochlear potentials. Cheatham MA Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2995299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe. Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating peripheral gain and compression using fixed-duration masking curves. Yasin I; Drga V; Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4145-55. PubMed ID: 23742366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse. Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions. Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea as shown by offset action potential (AP) masking curves. Schmiedt RA J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1357-9. PubMed ID: 2324397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Compound action potential measures of frequency selectivity. van Heusden E; Smoorenburg GF Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():73-8. PubMed ID: 299191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Wegner O; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber suppression in the gerbil: normative data. Dolan TG; Mills JH; Schmiedt RA Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 4044422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Growth of pulsation threshold of a suppressed tone as a function of its level. Shannon RV; Houtgast T Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 3722004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]