These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Integrity in the advancement of nursing knowledge. Parse RR Nurs Sci Q; 1999 Jul; 12(3):187. PubMed ID: 11847661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Publication of a review article in "Ginekologia Polska" identified as a plagiarism from the "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology]. Poreba R Ginekol Pol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):561. PubMed ID: 9867475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem? Berg AO Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Plagiarism is dishonest and can easily be exposed]. Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Sep; 167(37):3479. PubMed ID: 16159453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Unconscious plagiarism and author's request for withdrawal of his paper under consideration]. KiraƧ FS Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2012 May; 12(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 22411137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics. Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Process and detection in fraud and deceit. Silverman S Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions]. Maisonneuve H Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn. Roehr B BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Etiquette in scientific publishing. Krishnan V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 24075666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [My explanation concerning the situation regarding articles identified as plagiarism]. Jendryczko A Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9644028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India. Sabir H; Kumbhare S; Parate A; Kumar R; Das S Med Health Care Philos; 2015 May; 18(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 25316327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades. Handelsman J DNA Cell Biol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18279120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]