159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22297396)
1. Complete electrode model in EEG: relationship and differences to the point electrode model.
Pursiainen S; Lucka F; Wolters CH
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(4):999-1017. PubMed ID: 22297396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.
Pursiainen S; Lew S; Wolters CH
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):876-884. PubMed ID: 27852731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced Boundary Electrode Modeling for tES and Parallel tES/EEG.
Pursiainen S; Agsten B; Wagner S; Wolters CH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Jan; 26(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28961118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. General bounds for electrode mislocation on the EEG inverse problem.
Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20599288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling.
Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
Boyle A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of electrode properties on EEG measurements and a related inverse problem.
Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
Med Eng Phys; 2000 Oct; 22(8):535-45. PubMed ID: 11182578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel hydrogel-based preparation-free EEG electrode.
Alba NA; Sclabassi RJ; Sun M; Cui XT
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Aug; 18(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 20423811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study on the reference electrode standardization technique for a realistic head model.
Zhai Y; Yao D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Dec; 76(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 15501509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Laarne PH; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1547-54. PubMed ID: 15376503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical model of coherent potentials measured with different electrode recording site sizes.
Nelson MJ; Pouget P
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(5):1291-300. PubMed ID: 22131376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of electrode density and electrolyte spreading in dense array electroencephalographic recording.
Greischar LL; Burghy CA; van Reekum CM; Jackson DC; Pizzagalli DA; Mueller C; Davidson RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):710-20. PubMed ID: 15036067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel dry polymer foam electrodes for long-term EEG measurement.
Lin CT; Liao LD; Liu YH; Wang IJ; Lin BS; Chang JY
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1200-7. PubMed ID: 21193371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
