179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22297425)
1. Variations in constrained retrieval.
Alban MW; Kelley CM
Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):681-92. PubMed ID: 22297425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information.
Danckert SL; MacLeod CM; Fernandes MA
Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1374-86. PubMed ID: 21647810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.
Dudukovic NM; Dubrow S; Wagner AD
Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 19744935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Top-down constraint on recognition memory.
Kantner J; Lindsay DS
Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):465-79. PubMed ID: 23180311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Source-constrained recall: front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality.
Halamish V; Goldsmith M; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21859234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The temporal contiguity effect predicts episodic memory performance.
Sederberg PB; Miller JF; Howard MW; Kahana MJ
Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):689-99. PubMed ID: 20852233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disregarding familiarity during recollection attempts: content-specific recapitulation as a retrieval orientation strategy.
Gray SJ; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):134-47. PubMed ID: 25419819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.
McCabe DP; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 21264598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.
Jacoby LL; Shimizu Y; Daniels KA; Rhodes MG
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):852-7. PubMed ID: 16524001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Source-constrained retrieval and survival processing.
Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; VanArsdall JE; Blunt JR
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 25092224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.
Raposo A; Frade S; Alves M
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():309-319. PubMed ID: 27373768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?
Sahakyan L; Waldum ER; Benjamin AS; Bickett SP
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 19460953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?
Koen JD; Aly M; Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1726-41. PubMed ID: 23834057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. List strength effect without list length effect in recognition memory.
Buratto LG; Lamberts K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 17886194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall.
Polyn SM; Norman KA; Kahana MJ
Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):129-56. PubMed ID: 19159151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
Diana RA; Reder LM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.
Ozubko JD; Gopie N; MacLeod CM
Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 22127849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.
Rosenstreich E; Goshen-Gottstein Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130403. PubMed ID: 26135583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
