These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22297494)
41. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer. Vakili R; Choudhri SA; Tauber S; Shields MB J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 12483093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers. Jain AK; Saini JS; Gupta R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 48(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11271930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of Oculab Tono-Pen readings obtained from various corneal and scleral locations. Khan JA; Davis M; Graham CE; Trank J; Whitacre MM Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Oct; 109(10):1444-6. PubMed ID: 1929938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes. Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats. Andrade SF; Palozzi RJ; Giuffrida R; de Campos RJ; Santos Gde C; Fukui RM Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():14-20. PubMed ID: 22050624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children. Bradfield YS; Kaminski BM; Repka MX; Melia M; ; Davitt BV; Johnson DA; Kraker RT; Manny RE; Matta NS; Schloff S; Weise KK J AAPOS; 2012 Jun; 16(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 22459105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Simon G; Small RH; Ren Q; Parel JM Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 8494810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of scleral and corneal Tono-Pen readings. Kolin T; Wedemeyer LL; Kolin E; Braun Y J AAPOS; 2003 Aug; 7(4):291-2. PubMed ID: 12917618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of Tono-Pen AVIA intraocular pressure measurements performed at limbus with central corneal Tono-Pen AVIA intraocular pressure. Sharma R; Majumdar S; Sobti A; Arora T; Agarwal T; Dada T Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):943-6. PubMed ID: 23328700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of corneal thickness changes during active uveitis on Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry. Heinz C; Taneri S; Roesel M; Heiligenhaus A Ophthalmic Res; 2012; 48(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22354174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validity of Tono-pachymetry for Measuring Corrected Intraocular Pressure in Non-surgical and Post-photorefractive Keratectomy Eyes. Hahn IK; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Tchah H; Moon CH Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 28243023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Horowitz GS; Byles J; Lee J; D'Este C Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 15575828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]