372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22297728)
1. Correction to DFT interaction energies by an empirical dispersion term valid for a range of intermolecular distances.
Deligkaris C; Rodriguez JH
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2012 Mar; 14(10):3414-24. PubMed ID: 22297728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
Hobza P
Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine...cytosine, adenine...thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment.
Jurecka P; Hobza P
J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Dec; 125(50):15608-13. PubMed ID: 14664608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-empirical molecular orbital methods including dispersion corrections for the accurate prediction of the full range of intermolecular interactions in biomolecules.
McNamara JP; Hillier IH
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2007 May; 9(19):2362-70. PubMed ID: 17492099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in structure, energy, and spectrum between neutral, protonated, and deprotonated phenol dimers: comparison of various density functionals with ab initio theory.
Kołaski M; Kumar A; Singh NJ; Kim KS
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 13(3):991-1001. PubMed ID: 21063580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the nature of stabilization in weak, medium, and strong charge-transfer complexes: CCSD(T)/CBS and SAPT calculations.
Karthikeyan S; Sedlak R; Hobza P
J Phys Chem A; 2011 Sep; 115(34):9422-8. PubMed ID: 21375294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of aromatic NH···π, OH···π, and CH···π interactions of alanine using MP2, CCSD, and DFT methods.
Mohan N; Vijayalakshmi KP; Koga N; Suresh CH
J Comput Chem; 2010 Dec; 31(16):2874-82. PubMed ID: 20928850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appropriate description of intermolecular interactions in the methane hydrates: an assessment of DFT methods.
Liu Y; Zhao J; Li F; Chen Z
J Comput Chem; 2013 Jan; 34(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 22949382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Density functional theory augmented with an empirical dispersion term. Interaction energies and geometries of 80 noncovalent complexes compared with ab initio quantum mechanics calculations.
Jurecka P; Cerný J; Hobza P; Salahub DR
J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan; 28(2):555-69. PubMed ID: 17186489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the reliability of the AMBER force field and its empirical dispersion contribution for the description of noncovalent complexes.
Kolár M; Berka K; Jurecka P; Hobza P
Chemphyschem; 2010 Aug; 11(11):2399-408. PubMed ID: 20629063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies.
DiLabio GA; Johnson ER; Otero-de-la-Roza A
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 15(31):12821-8. PubMed ID: 23803877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intermolecular interaction energies from SAPT and DFT including empirical dispersion contributions.
Hesselmann A
J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11321-30. PubMed ID: 21806071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On geometries of stacked and H-bonded nucleic acid base pairs determined at various DFT, MP2, and CCSD(T) levels up to the CCSD(T)/complete basis set limit level.
Dabkowska I; Jurecka P; Hobza P
J Chem Phys; 2005 May; 122(20):204322. PubMed ID: 15945739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stabilization energies of the hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of nucleic acid base pairs in the crystal geometries of CG, AT, and AC DNA steps and in the NMR geometry of the 5'-d(GCGAAGC)-3' hairpin: Complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels.
Dabkowska I; Gonzalez HV; Jurecka P; Hobza P
J Phys Chem A; 2005 Feb; 109(6):1131-6. PubMed ID: 16833422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Highly accurate CCSD(T) and DFT-SAPT stabilization energies of H-bonded and stacked structures of the uracil dimer.
Pitonák M; Riley KE; Neogrády P; Hobza P
Chemphyschem; 2008 Aug; 9(11):1636-44. PubMed ID: 18574830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate interaction energies at density functional theory level by means of an efficient dispersion correction.
Krishtal A; Vanommeslaeghe K; Olasz A; Veszprémi T; Van Alsenoy C; Geerlings P
J Chem Phys; 2009 May; 130(17):174101. PubMed ID: 19425763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein-ligand interaction energies with dispersion corrected density functional theory and high-level wave function based methods.
Antony J; Grimme S; Liakos DG; Neese F
J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11210-20. PubMed ID: 21842894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects in π-type interactions.
Carrell EJ; Thorne CM; Tschumper GS
J Chem Phys; 2012 Jan; 136(1):014103. PubMed ID: 22239765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals.
Burns LA; Vázquez-Mayagoitia A; Sumpter BG; Sherrill CD
J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(8):084107. PubMed ID: 21361527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference MP2/CBS and CCSD(T) quantum-chemical calculations on stacked adenine dimers. Comparison with DFT-D, MP2.5, SCS(MI)-MP2, M06-2X, CBS(SCS-D) and force field descriptions.
Morgado CA; Jurecka P; Svozil D; Hobza P; Sponer J
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Apr; 12(14):3522-34. PubMed ID: 20336251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
