108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299075)
1. Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner.
Holst S; Persson A; Wichmann M; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 22299075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study.
Almasri R; Drago CJ; Siegel SC; Hardigan PC
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 21492296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements.
Jemt T; Hjalmarsson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e175-82. PubMed ID: 22171700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
van der Zel JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Research on computer-aided technology of surgical guide for dental implant].
Wu T; Liao W; Dai N; Wang P; Chen N
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21485172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
Eliasson A; Wennerberg A; Johansson A; Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study.
Nokar S; Moslehifard E; Bahman T; Bayanzadeh M; Nasirpouri F; Nokar A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 21691598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete oral rehabilitation with implants using CAD/CAM technology, stereolithography, and conoscopic holography.
Bentz RM; Balshi SF
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 22223191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
