These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299075)

  • 21. The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation.
    Chan DC; Chung AK; Haines J; Yau EH; Kuo CC
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 21834706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The research and development of noncontact 3-D laser dental model measuring and analyzing system.
    Lu P; Li Z; Wang Y; Chen J; Zhao J
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 Nov; 3(3):7-14. PubMed ID: 11314539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
    Flügge TV; Att W; Metzger MC; Nelson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 27148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optical three-dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility.
    Del Corso M; Abà G; Vazquez L; Dargaud J; Dohan Ehrenfest DM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 18657149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
    Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misfit of implant fixed complete denture following computer-guided surgery.
    Oyama K; Kan JY; Kleinman AS; Runcharassaeng K; Lozada JL; Goodacre CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19344035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach.
    Komiyama A; Pettersson A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20868453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.
    Persson AS; Andersson M; Odén A; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 18336900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments.
    Priest G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9 Suppl 2):22-32. PubMed ID: 16125013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
    Karl M; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.