628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299076)
1. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns.
Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 19961993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
