These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299097)
1. A retrospective analysis of immediately placed implants in 418 sites exhibiting periapical pathology: results and clinical considerations. Fugazzotto P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 22299097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective analysis of implants immediately placed in sites with and without periapical pathology in sixty-four patients. Fugazzotto PA J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 21627462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sites with chronic periapical pathologic features combined with plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of single-cohort study. Del Fabbro M; Boggian C; Taschieri S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2476-84. PubMed ID: 19837321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement. van Kesteren CJ; Schoolfield J; West J; Oates T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 20556256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathology by immediate implants: a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Siegenthaler DW; Jung RE; Holderegger C; Roos M; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):727-37. PubMed ID: 17888019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of single immediate implants placed in post-extraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns: a 3-year prospective study. Montoya-Salazar V; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Torres-Sánchez C; Lynch CD; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 24675527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical and radiological outcome after 3 years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology. Truninger TC; Philipp AO; Siegenthaler DW; Roos M; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 20678132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Chen ST; Buser D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():186-217. PubMed ID: 19885446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the clinical radiological and aesthetic outcome after 5 years of immediately placed implants in sockets exhibiting periapical pathology. Jung RE; Zaugg B; Philipp AO; Truninger TC; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):839-46. PubMed ID: 22672584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration. Hassan KS; Kassim A; Al Ogaly AU Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e8-e15. PubMed ID: 18805718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry. Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants. West JD; Oates TW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 17929524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified insertion technique for immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the first maxillary molar sites: a 3-year prospective study. Acocella A; Bertolai R; Sacco R Implant Dent; 2010 Jun; 19(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 20523178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term results of implants immediately placed into extraction sockets grafted with β-tricalcium phosphate: a retrospective study. Harel N; Moses O; Palti A; Ormianer Z J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e63-8. PubMed ID: 23351769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Chen ST; Wilson TG; Hämmerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():12-25. PubMed ID: 15635942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-year re-entry results of guided bone regeneration around immediately placed implants with immediate or conventional loading: a case series. Shibly O; Kutkut A; Albandar JM J Int Acad Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 14(3):62-8. PubMed ID: 22908535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interim endodontic therapy for alveolar socket bone regeneration of infected hopeless teeth prior to implant therapy. Rass MA J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 20218869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up. Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]