638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299111)
1. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances.
Uribe F; Cutrera A; Nanda R
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report.
Gandedkar NH; Revankar AV; Ganeshkar SV
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A treatment method for Class II Division 1 patients with extraction of permanent maxillary first molars.
Booij JW; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19388432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total distalization of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Choi YJ; Lee JS; Cha JY; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):823-33. PubMed ID: 21640890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distalization of maxillary molars with Modified Greenfield Appliance and Modified Nance Appliance as applied to specific case.
Palencar AJ
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2006; 17(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 17091923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of self-ligating brackets, superelastic wires, expansion/proclination, and permanent retention--a word of caution.
Zachrisson BU
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 16779979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS).
Ikegami T; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lee W; Hibino K
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid palatal expander: an anchor unit for second molar distalization in Angle Class II treatment.
Kolokitha OE; Papadopoulou AK
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 20209182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Uribe F; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21867432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midline correction with mini-screw anchorage and lingual appliances.
Youn SH
J Clin Orthod; 2006 May; 40(5):314-22; quiz 308. PubMed ID: 16804246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing a pre-adjusted orthodontic appliance prescription for anterior teeth.
Thickett E; Taylor NG; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 34(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 17545296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined use of miniscrews and continuous arch for intrusive root movement of incisors in Class II division 2 with gummy smile.
Kim SJ; Kim JW; Choi TH; Lee KJ
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 24512532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
