These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22299230)
1. Role reversal: deal would give not-for-profit ownership stake. Selvam A Mod Healthc; 2011 Dec; 41(50):12-3. PubMed ID: 22299230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Goodbye Cleveland. Columbia to sell stake in controversial joint venture; hospitals to regain not-for-profit status. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1999 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 10345691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Both sides win. Deal to pay off for Columbia and not-for-profit group. Pallarito K Mod Healthc; 1998 May; 28(21):2-3, 12. PubMed ID: 10182308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of ownership, system affiliation and corporate unbundling on the performance of hospitals. Weil TP Health Care Strateg Manage; 1986 Jul; 4(7):4-9. PubMed ID: 10278526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A unified health ministry in central Tennessee: eleven years of successful partnership. Stringfield D; Prybil L; Tighe J Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1997; 42(4):473-88. PubMed ID: 10174461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of ownership and system affiliation on the economic performance of hospitals. Renn SC; Schramm CJ; Watt JM; Derzon RA Inquiry; 1985; 22(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 2931366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Putting family first. For-profits find selling easier with other for-profits. Galloro V Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(32):20. PubMed ID: 16117083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Joining forces. Not-for-profit sector sees three deals move forward. Galloro V Mod Healthc; 2010 Apr; 40(15):16. PubMed ID: 20432541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Options for maintaining Catholic sponsorship. Himmelsbach WA Health Prog; 1985 Sep; 66(7):54-8. PubMed ID: 10273846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Profitability a matter of ownership status. For-profit systems see earnings rise, while not-for-profits lag. Bellandi D; Kirchheimer B; Saphir A Mod Healthc; 2000 Jun; 30(24):24-6, 30-40, 42-9. PubMed ID: 11183500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ties that bind. Fubini S; Limb S Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(5):44-7. PubMed ID: 10173718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint ventures between for-profits and not-for-profits: do they work and how? Tokarski C Health Syst Lead; 1996 Apr; 3(3):4-13. PubMed ID: 10156951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sharp decision rocks another Calif. deal. Shinkman R Mod Healthc; 1996 Dec; 26(50):20. PubMed ID: 10162713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Point-counterpoint. Not-for-profits vs. for profits: is one better for patient care? Developing a spectrum of innovative partnerships. Barbakow JC Health Syst Lead; 1997; 4(8):16-7. PubMed ID: 10170253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A not-for-profit perspective on multi-hospital systems. Woodham R Tex Hosp; 1980 May; 35(13):23-4. PubMed ID: 10247004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospitals in transition: a perspective. Custer WS; Musacchio RA J Med Pract Manage; 1986 Apr; 1(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 10281834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dispute over ownership of Fla. hospital heats up. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(40):18. PubMed ID: 10151436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative financial analysis of multi-institutional organizations by ownership type. Coyne JS Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(6):48-63. PubMed ID: 10274570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncompensated care before and after prospective payment: the role of hospital location and ownership. Hultman CI Health Serv Res; 1991 Dec; 26(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 1743971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]