142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22300844)
1. Posterior cruciate substituting versus posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty prostheses: a meta-analysis.
Luo SX; Zhao JM; Su W; Li XF; Dong GF
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 22300844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.
Kim YH; Choi Y; Kwon OR; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19339558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can high-flexion tibial inserts improve range of motion after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?
Crow BD; McCauley JC; Ezzet KA
Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):667. PubMed ID: 20839712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Luo SX; Su W; Zhao JM; Sha K; Wei QJ; Li XF
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 21074357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior cruciate-retaining, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum 4-year follow-up study.
Elwood JJ; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD
Orthopedics; 2012 Dec; 35(12):e1699-704. PubMed ID: 23218624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of total knee prostheses with or without preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament].
Vinciguerra B; Pascarel X; Honton JL
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 7638388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial.
Harato K; Bourne RB; Victor J; Snyder M; Hart J; Ries MD
Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 18325770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.
Chaudhary R; Beaupré LA; Johnston DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis.
Verra WC; van den Boom LG; Jacobs W; Clement DJ; Wymenga AA; Nelissen RG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD004803. PubMed ID: 24114343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-flex posterior cruciate-retaining vs posterior cruciate-substituting designs in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
Yagishita K; Muneta T; Ju YJ; Morito T; Yamazaki J; Sekiya I
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Mar; 27(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 21680139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs.
Seon JK; Park SJ; Lee KB; Yoon TR; Kozanek M; Song EK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 19255229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laxity and functional results of Miller-Galante total knee prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament sparing after a 6-year follow-up].
Besson A; Brazier J; Chantelot C; Migaud H; Gougeon F; Duquennoy A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1999 Dec; 85(8):797-802. PubMed ID: 10637880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Bercik MJ; Joshi A; Parvizi J
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 23433255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of posterior condylar offset and anteroposterior femorotibial translation on knee flexion after posterior cruciate-sacrificing self alignment bearing total knee arthroplasty].
Zhang H; Lü L; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Wang W; Wei B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 25(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21351608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Sierra RJ; Berry DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation: Comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at eight years follow-up].
Goutallier D; Manicom O; Van Driessche S
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 18929754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention versus Posterior Stabilization for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Jiang C; Liu Z; Wang Y; Bian Y; Feng B; Weng X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147865. PubMed ID: 26824368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro investigation of knee joint kinematics following cruciate retaining versus cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.
Siebel T; Käfer W
Acta Orthop Belg; 2003 Oct; 69(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 14648953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.
Zelle J; Van der Zanden AC; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):842-9. PubMed ID: 19733944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
