These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22301100)
21. Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):810-5. PubMed ID: 24168787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Rocha KM; Krueger RR Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):293-301.e1. PubMed ID: 24792107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Refractive and keratometric stability in high myopic LASIK with high-frequency femtosecond and excimer lasers. Kanellopoulos AJ; Asimellis G J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 24088061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Liu M; Chen Y; Wang D; Zhou Y; Zhang X; He J; Zhang T; Sun Y; Liu Q Cornea; 2016 Feb; 35(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 26684046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanism for a Rare, Idiosyncratic Complication Following Hyperopic LASIK: Diurnal Shift in Refractive Error Due to Epithelial Thickness Profile Changes. Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Archer TJ; Carp GI J Refract Surg; 2016 Jun; 32(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 27304599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does Pregnancy Affect Refractive and Corneal Stability or Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Myopic LASIK? Kanellopoulos AJ; Vingopoulos F J Refract Surg; 2020 Feb; 36(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 32032433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Corneal power, thickness, and stiffness: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of PRK and LASIK for myopia. Hjortdal JØ; Møller-Pedersen T; Ivarsen A; Ehlers N J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 15721693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser. Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms. Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Johnson N J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 20163075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome. Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined laser in situ keratomileusis and prophylactic high-fluence corneal collagen crosslinking for high myopia: two-year safety and efficacy. Kanellopoulos AJ; Asimellis G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1426-33. PubMed ID: 26287881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner. Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Silverman RH; Coleman DJ J Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 26(9):646-59. PubMed ID: 19928698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Longitudinal comparison of outcomes after sub-Bowman keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis: randomized, double-masked study. Wong RC; Yu M; Chan TC; Chong KK; Jhanji V Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 159(5):835-45.e3. PubMed ID: 25681001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Epi-LASIK: a confocal microscopy analysis of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma. Ramírez M; Hernández-Quintela E; Naranjo-Tackman R Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012 Jul; 43(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22788583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement. Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system. Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]