These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22301618)
1. PERTHESE implant-identical cohesive-gel sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective report on 200 consecutive cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry. Gore SM; Lamberty BG Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Mar; 32(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 22301618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary on: PERTHESE implant-identical cohesive-gel sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective study of 200 consecutive cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry. Maxwell GP; Gabriel A Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Mar; 32(3):319-21. PubMed ID: 22395322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants. Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study of 708 form-stable silicone gel breast implants. Stevens WG; Hirsch EM; Tenenbaum MJ; Acevedo M Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Sep; 30(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 20884898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience. Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system). Riggio E Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel. Stevens WG; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Broadway D; Zeidler K; Godinez TB Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25948657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Blount AL; Martin MD; Lineberry KD; Kettaneh N; Alfonso DR Aesthet Surg J; 2013 May; 33(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 23636624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Brown MH; Shenker R; Silver SA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1. PubMed ID: 16141814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants. Duteille F; Perrot P; Bacheley MH; Stewart S Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29040345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a single surgeon's 20-year experience. Huang GJ; Wichmann JL; Mills DC Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Sep; 31(7):781-801. PubMed ID: 21908810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel. Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; d'Incelli RC Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 26961987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Bengtson BP; Murphy DK Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Feb; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 25717116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment. Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants. Sampaio Góes JC Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants. Largent JA; Reisman NR; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Jewell ML Aesthet Surg J; 2013 May; 33(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 23559355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses. Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]