These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22301848)

  • 1. Comparison of contrast media and low-molecular-weight dextran for frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Ozaki Y; Kitabata H; Tsujioka H; Hosokawa S; Kashiwagi M; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Takarada S; Kubo T; Kimura K; Tanaka A; Hirata K; Mizukoshi M; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Circ J; 2012; 76(4):922-7. PubMed ID: 22301848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time-domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion.
    Takarada S; Imanishi T; Liu Y; Ikejima H; Tsujioka H; Kuroi A; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Kitabata H; Kubo T; Nakamura N; Hirata K; Tanaka A; Mizukoshi M; Akasaka T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 19937788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low molecular weight dextran provides similar optical coherence tomography coronary imaging compared to radiographic contrast media.
    Frick K; Michael TT; Alomar M; Mohammed A; Rangan BV; Abdullah S; Grodin J; Hastings JL; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 23804461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Low-Molecular-Weight Dextran　- Effect on Renal Function.
    Kurogi K; Ishii M; Sakamoto K; Komaki S; Kusaka H; Yamamoto N; Takashio S; Arima Y; Yamamoto E; Kaikita K; Tsujita K
    Circ J; 2020 May; 84(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 32350234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison among different flushing media for intracoronary imaging with optical coherence tomography].
    Li B; Li ZB; Wang JP; Zhao L; Wang ZH; Wu JD; Liu B
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 52(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 38326065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography catheter induced motion artefacts on quantitative measurements of a PLLA-based bioresorbable scaffold.
    van Ditzhuijzen NS; Karanasos A; Bruining N; van den Heuvel M; Sorop O; Ligthart J; Witberg K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Zijlstra F; Duncker DJ; van Beusekom HM; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 30(6):1013-26. PubMed ID: 24831994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the efficacy of saline flush in frequency-domain optical coherence tomography for intracoronary imaging.
    Kimura M; Takeda T; Tsujino Y; Matsumoto Y; Yamaji M; Sakaguchi T; Maeda K; Mabuchi H; Murakami T
    Heart Vessels; 2024 Apr; 39(4):310-318. PubMed ID: 38062328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of coronary optical coherence tomography for lumen and length measurements in humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-VARiability] study).
    Fedele S; Biondi-Zoccai G; Kwiatkowski P; Di Vito L; Occhipinti M; Cremonesi A; Albertucci M; Materia L; Paoletti G; Prati F
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 22748353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dextran or Saline Can Replace Contrast for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography in Lower Extremity Arteries.
    Kendrick DE; Allemang MT; Gosling AF; Nagavalli A; Kim AH; Nishino S; Parikh SA; Bezerra HG; Kashyap VS
    J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Oct; 23(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 27385151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence, predictors, morphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of stent edge dissections detected by optical coherence tomography.
    Chamié D; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Yamamoto H; Kanaya T; Stefano GT; Fujino Y; Mehanna E; Wang W; Abdul-Aziz A; Dias M; Simon DI; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):800-13. PubMed ID: 23871510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clear view, clear benefit.
    Takano M; Inami S; Mizuno K
    Circ J; 2012; 76(4):816-7. PubMed ID: 22354198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Okamura T; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Schultz C; van der Giessen WJ; Ligthart J; Regar E; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Apr; 6(9):1037-45. PubMed ID: 21518674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra- and interobserver reliability and intra-catheter reproducibility using frequency domain optical coherence tomography for the evaluation of morphometric stent parameters and qualitative assessment of stent strut coverage.
    Antonsen L; Thayssen P; Junker A; Veien KT; Hansen HS; Hansen KN; Hougaard M; Jensen LO
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):469-77. PubMed ID: 26475731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
    Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.