293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302203)
1. Restoration of labral anatomy and biomechanics after superior labral anterior-posterior repair: comparison of mattress versus simple technique.
Boddula MR; Adamson GJ; Gupta A; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):875-81. PubMed ID: 22302203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.
Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferior anchor cortical perforation with arthroscopic Bankart repair: a cadaveric study.
Lim TK; Koh KH; Lee SH; Shon MS; Bae TS; Park WH; Yoo JC
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jan; 29(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23276411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the extent of a type II SLAP lesion required to cause peel-back of the glenoid labrum--a cadaveric study.
Seneviratne A; Montgomery K; Bevilacqua B; Zikria B
Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1163.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17084291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Failure Mode Between Simple and Mattress Suture Configuration in Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs: A Cadaveric Study.
Miskovsky SN; Sasala LM; Talbot CN; Knapik DM
Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Aug; 8(8):2325967120942133. PubMed ID: 32864384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of 3 suture anchor configurations for repair of type II SLAP lesions.
Domb BG; Ehteshami JR; Shindle MK; Gulotta L; Zoghi-Moghadam M; MacGillivray JD; Altchek DW
Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17276220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attachment types of the long head of the biceps tendon to the glenoid labrum and their relationships with the glenohumeral ligaments.
Tuoheti Y; Itoi E; Minagawa H; Yamamoto N; Saito H; Seki N; Okada K; Shimada Y; Abe H
Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1242-9. PubMed ID: 16226654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulated type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions do not alter the path of glenohumeral articulation: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
Youm T; Tibone JE; ElAttrache NS; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):767-74. PubMed ID: 18272798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical assessment of Type II superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions associated with anterior shoulder capsular laxity as seen in throwers: a cadaveric study.
Mihata T; McGarry MH; Tibone JE; Fitzpatrick MJ; Kinoshita M; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1604-10. PubMed ID: 18359822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations.
Provencher MT; Detterline AJ; Ghodadra N; Romeo AA; Bach BR; Cole BJ; Verma N
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 36(6):1132-8. PubMed ID: 18354146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple versus horizontal suture anchor repair of Bankart lesions: which better restores labral anatomy?
Hagstrom LS; Marzo JM
Arthroscopy; 2013 Feb; 29(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 23290185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of a double-loaded glenoid anchor configuration: can fewer anchors provide equivalent fixation?
Kamath GV; Hoover S; Creighton RA; Weinhold P; Barrow A; Spang JT
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jan; 41(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 23211709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variations in glenoid rim anatomy: implications regarding anchor insertion.
Lehtinen JT; Tingart MJ; Apreleva M; Ticker JB; Warner JJ
Arthroscopy; 2004 Feb; 20(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14760351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 6-O'clock Anchor Increases Labral Repair Strength in a Biomechanical Shoulder Instability Model.
Bokshan SL; DeFroda SF; Gil JA; Badida R; Crisco JJ; Owens BD
Arthroscopy; 2019 Oct; 35(10):2795-2800. PubMed ID: 31395394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair.
Mazzocca AD; Chowaniec D; Cote MP; Fierra J; Apostolakos J; Nowak M; Arciero RA; Beitzel K
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 22301360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Footprint contact restoration between the biceps-labrum complex and the glenoid rim in SLAP repair: a comparative cadaveric study using pressure-sensitive film.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee JH; Chun YM
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 23726107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new arthroscopic technique to determine anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss: validation of the secant chord theory in a cadaveric model.
Detterline AJ; Provencher MT; Ghodadra N; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1249-56. PubMed ID: 19896046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques in posterior type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions.
Yoo JC; Ahn JH; Lee SH; Lim HC; Choi KW; Bae TS; Lee CY
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 18069010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in the ultimate strength of the biceps anchor and the generation of type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions in a cadaveric model.
Shepard MF; Dugas JR; Zeng N; Andrews JR
Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(5):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15262642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
