These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2230222)
1. Immunosuppressive effects of clonidine on the induction of contact sensitization in the balb/c mouse. Robinson MK; Sozeri TJ J Invest Dermatol; 1990 Nov; 95(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 2230222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of an in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for predictive assessment of immunologic responsiveness to contact sensitizers. Robinson MK J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 2723450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity. Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of an optimized in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay to detect contact sensitivity to nickel sulfate in mice. Robinson MK; Sneller DL Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1990 Jun; 104(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 1694310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses. Robinson MK; Cruze CA Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pimecrolimus inhibits the elicitation phase but does not suppress the sensitization phase in murine contact hypersensitivity, in contrast to tacrolimus and cyclosporine A. Meingassner JG; Fahrngruber H; Bavandi A J Invest Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 121(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 12839566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site. Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase. Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact sensitization of mice to nickel sulphate and potassium dichromate. Kimber I; Bentley AN; Hilton J Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Nov; 23(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 2096022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay. Kimber I; Weisenberger C J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suppressive effects of transdermal clonidine administration on contact hypersensitivity reactions in guinea pigs. Goeptar AR; de Groot J; Lang M; van Tol RG; Scheper RJ Int J Immunopharmacol; 1988; 10(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 3182151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. Gerberick GF; House RV; Fletcher ER; Ryan CA Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 19(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 1459374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective stimulation of cutaneous interleukin 6 expression by skin allergens. Holliday MR; Dearman RJ; Corsini E; Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8821678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the ear swelling test and the local lymph node assay in hamsters. Clottens FL; Breyssens A; De Raeve H; Demedts M; Nemery B J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 1996 Jun; 35(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8782095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig. Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PTK787/ZK 222584 inhibits both the induction and elicitation phases of contact hypersensitivity. Yamamoto A; Watanabe H; Sueki H; Nakanishi T; Yasuhara H; Iijima M J Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 34(7):419-29. PubMed ID: 17584317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contact sensitivity of and cross-sensitivity between 2-(2'-hydroxy-5'-methylphenyl)benzotriazole (Tinuvin P) and 2-(2'-hydroxy-3'-tert-butyl-5'-methylphenyl)-5-chlorobenzotriazole (Tinuvin 326) evaluated by lymph node cell proliferation and ear swelling response in mice. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Toxicol Lett; 1994 Apr; 71(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8171445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]