These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302224)

  • 1. A methodology for evaluating and ranking water quantity indicators in support of ecosystem-based management.
    James CA; Kershner J; O'Neill S; Levin PS
    Environ Manage; 2012 Mar; 49(3):703-19. PubMed ID: 22302224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting indicator portfolios for marine species and food webs: a Puget sound case study.
    Kershner J; Samhouri JF; James CA; Levin PS
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25248. PubMed ID: 21991305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valued ecosystem components for watershed cumulative effects: an analysis of environmental impact assessments in the South Saskatchewan River watershed, Canada.
    Ball MA; Noble BF; Dubé MG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):469-79. PubMed ID: 22733426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indicators for Monitoring Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A Systematic Review of Indicator Selection Methods.
    Schwemlein S; Cronk R; Bartram J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 26999180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Criteria-based ranking (CBR): A comprehensive process for selecting and prioritizing monitoring indicators.
    Ho E
    MethodsX; 2018; 5():1324-1329. PubMed ID: 30386733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indicators of marine ecosystem integrity for Canada's Pacific: An expert-based hierarchical approach.
    Okey TA
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():1114-1125. PubMed ID: 30248836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Watershed approach in water resources planning and quality management.
    Khadse GK; Nanoti MV
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Jul; 49(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 18476440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum flows and levels method of the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida, USA.
    Neubauer CP; Hall GB; Lowe EF; Robison CP; Hupalo RB; Keenan LW
    Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):1101-14. PubMed ID: 18802732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indicators in environmental health: identifying and selecting common sets.
    Eyles J; Furgal C
    Can J Public Health; 2002; 93 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-7. PubMed ID: 12425178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental water in a regulated river system: the Murrumbidgee River planning approach to the determination of environmental needs.
    Shields J; Good R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):241-9. PubMed ID: 12171359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting environmental function analysis for management of protected areas in small islands--case of Pico Island (the Azores).
    Calado H; Bragagnolo C; Silva S; Vergílio M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 171():231-242. PubMed ID: 26905658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metrics to assess ecological condition, change, and impacts in sandy beach ecosystems.
    Schlacher TA; Schoeman DS; Jones AR; Dugan JE; Hubbard DM; Defeo O; Peterson CH; Weston MA; Maslo B; Olds AD; Scapini F; Nel R; Harris LR; Lucrezi S; Lastra M; Huijbers CM; Connolly RM
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Nov; 144():322-35. PubMed ID: 25014753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Assessment system for watershed ecological health in the United States: development and application].
    Zhang H; Luo YM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 24(7):2063-72. PubMed ID: 24175541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A criteria and indicators monitoring framework for food forestry embedded in the principles of ecological restoration.
    Park H; Higgs E
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):113. PubMed ID: 29396659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of ecosystem and its services conservation: indicators and methods].
    Lü YH; Zhang LW; Wang JL
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 May; 24(5):1237-43. PubMed ID: 24015539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of marine ecosystem services indicators: Experiences and lessons learned from 14 European case studies.
    Lillebø AI; Somma F; Norén K; Gonçalves J; Alves MF; Ballarini E; Bentes L; Bielecka M; Chubarenko BV; Heise S; Khokhlov V; Klaoudatos D; Lloret J; Margonski P; Marín A; Matczak M; Oen AM; Palmieri MG; Przedrzymirska J; Różyński G; Sousa AI; Sousa LP; Tuchkovenko Y; Zaucha J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Oct; 12(4):726-34. PubMed ID: 27064511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision of sediment quality triad indicators in Puget Sound (Washington, USA): I. a Sediment Chemistry Index and targets for mixtures of toxicants.
    Long ER; Dutch M; Partridge V; Weakland S; Welch K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 22488838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: the case of the defence sector.
    Ramos TB; Alves I; Subtil R; Joanaz de Melo J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):410-32. PubMed ID: 16580128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from spring creek watershed, Pennsylvania, USA.
    Brooks RP; Wardrop DH; Cole CA
    Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):673-87. PubMed ID: 16841177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.