BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302533)

  • 41. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Expanding Our Horizons: Editorial Comment on "The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate with Comparison to Esophagectomy-Alone Controls".
    Ishikawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):4165-4166. PubMed ID: 38568376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ischemic Conditioning of the Stomach in the Prevention of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy.
    Kechagias A; van Rossum PSN; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1614-23. PubMed ID: 26857639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience.
    Sundaram A; Geronimo JC; Willer BL; Hoshino M; Torgersen Z; Juhasz A; Lee TH; Mittal SK
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 21853394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Levy RM; Trivedi D; Luketich JD
    Surg Clin North Am; 2012 Oct; 92(5):1265-85. PubMed ID: 23026281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perfusion of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy.
    Linder G; Hedberg J; Björck M; Sundbom M
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 27766735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.
    Lee JM; Chen SC; Yang SM; Tseng YF; Yang PW; Huang PM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2925-2931. PubMed ID: 27826778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression following ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit.
    Bludau M; Hölscher AH; Vallböhmer D; Metzger R; Bollschweiler E; Schröder W
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(8):847-52. PubMed ID: 22973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Minimally Invasive Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy Is Superior to Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Terms of Health-Related Quality of Life.
    Schmitz SM; Alizai PH; Eickhoff RM; Schooren L; Kroh A; Roeth AA; Neumann UP; Klink CD
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Mar; 31(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 32960143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study.
    Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Franchetti Y; Catalano PJ; Swanson S; Sugarbaker DJ; De Hoyos A; Maddaus MA; Nguyen NT; Benson AB; Fernando HC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 25575253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Functional capillary density in ischemic conditioning: implications for esophageal resection with the gastric conduit.
    Mittermair C; Klaus A; Scheidl S; Maglione M; Hermann M; Margreiter R; Nguyen N; Weiss H
    Am J Surg; 2008 Jul; 196(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18367142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Short-term Outcomes of Different Techniques for Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Before Esophagectomy: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Aiolfi A; Bona D; Bonitta G; Bonavina L;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Mar; 279(3):410-418. PubMed ID: 37830253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
    Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
    Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
    Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
    Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive versus open Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.
    Sun X; Wang G; Liu C; Xiong R; Wu H; Xie M; Xu S
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1487-1494. PubMed ID: 32239662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.