These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302644)
21. A further test of Hick's law with unequally like alternatives. Kaufman H; Levy RM Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Jun; 22(3):967-70. PubMed ID: 5963541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice. Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 24730597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neural activity in the frontal eye fields modulated by the number of alternatives in target choice. Lee KM; Keller EL J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 28(9):2242-51. PubMed ID: 18305257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of Hick's law of response speed in Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Mahurin RK; Pirozzolo FJ Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Aug; 77(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 8367225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence. Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():170-180. PubMed ID: 27093221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On Sequence Learning Models: Open-loop Control Not Strictly Guided by Hick's Law. Pavão R; Savietto JP; Sato JR; Xavier GF; Helene AF Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23018. PubMed ID: 26975409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Brown SD; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of the number of response alternatives on brain activity in response selection. Woo SH; Lee KM Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):950-8. PubMed ID: 17094117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of learning on perceptual decisions and its implication for speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Mendonça AG; Drugowitsch J; Vicente MI; DeWitt EEJ; Pouget A; Mainen ZF Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):2757. PubMed ID: 32488065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatiotemporal dynamics of random stimuli account for trial-to-trial variability in perceptual decision making. Park H; Lueckmann JM; von Kriegstein K; Bitzer S; Kiebel SJ Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():18832. PubMed ID: 26752272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model. Holmes WR; Trueblood JS; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2016 Mar; 85():1-29. PubMed ID: 26760448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Lee MD Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 18605474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantifying the benefits of using decision models with response time and accuracy data. Stafford T; Pirrone A; Croucher M; Krystalli A Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2142-2155. PubMed ID: 32232739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Krajbich I; Rangel A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(33):13852-7. PubMed ID: 21808009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Properties of saccades generated as a choice response. Lee KM; Keller EL; Heinen SJ Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 15827738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Decision speed induces context effects in choice. Hawkins G; Brown SD; Steyvers M; Wagenmakers EJ Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):206-15. PubMed ID: 22411178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A model of the uncertainty effects in choice reaction time that includes a major contribution from effector selection. Wright CE; Marino VF; Chubb C; Mann D Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):550-577. PubMed ID: 31081647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]