BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302814)

  • 1. Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.
    Swaminathan J; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 32(5):1747-56. PubMed ID: 22302814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distorted Tonotopic Coding of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.
    Henry KS; Kale S; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(7):2227-37. PubMed ID: 26888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.
    Henry KS; Heinz MG
    Hear Res; 2013 Sep; 303():39-47. PubMed ID: 23376018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.
    Heinz MG; Swaminathan J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):407-23. PubMed ID: 19365691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.
    Kale S; Micheyl C; Heinz MG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 15(3):465-82. PubMed ID: 24658856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.
    Wirtzfeld MR; Ibrahim RA; Bruce IC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 18(5):687-710. PubMed ID: 28748487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.
    Mepani AM; Verhulst S; Hancock KE; Garrett M; Vasilkov V; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1213-1222. PubMed ID: 33656936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.
    Moon IJ; Won JH; Park MH; Ives DT; Nie K; Heinz MG; Lorenzi C; Rubinstein JT
    J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(36):12145-54. PubMed ID: 25186758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes in the auditory nerve.
    Kale S; Micheyl C; Heinz MG
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():109-18. PubMed ID: 23716215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.
    Parida S; Heinz MG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 22(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 33188506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.
    Grant KJ; Mepani AM; Wu P; Hancock KE; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):418-431. PubMed ID: 32639924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient Neural Coding in Auditory and Speech Perception.
    Gervain J; Geffen MN
    Trends Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 42(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 30297085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.
    Shamma S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2818-33. PubMed ID: 23654388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.