278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22302814)
21. Sensorineural hearing loss amplifies neural coding of envelope information in the central auditory system of chinchillas.
Zhong Z; Henry KS; Heinz MG
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():55-62. PubMed ID: 24315815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicted effects of sensorineural hearing loss on across-fiber envelope coding in the auditory nerve.
Swaminathan J; Heinz MG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4001-13. PubMed ID: 21682421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.
Parida S; Heinz MG
J Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 42(8):1477-1490. PubMed ID: 34983817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2673-2680. PubMed ID: 31177325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech.
Ranasinghe KG; Vrana WA; Matney CJ; Kilgard MP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):527-42. PubMed ID: 22549175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of hearing loss and age on the binaural processing of temporal envelope and temporal fine structure information.
Moore BCJ
Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 402():107991. PubMed ID: 32418682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise.
Hopkins K; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):334-49. PubMed ID: 21786903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhancing speech envelope by integrating hair-cell adaptation into cochlear implant processing.
Azadpour M; Smith RL
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():48-57. PubMed ID: 27697486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between speech-evoked neural responses and perception of speech in noise in older adults.
Mai G; Tuomainen J; Howell P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1333. PubMed ID: 29604686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship between cochlear mechanics and speech-in-noise reception performance.
Otsuka S; Nakagawa S; Furukawa S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):EL265. PubMed ID: 31590549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants.
Lunner T; Hietkamp RK; Andersen MR; Hopkins K; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 22246137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The psychoacoustics of noise vocoded speech: a physiological means to a perceptual end.
Loebach JL; Wickesberg RE
Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 18556159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
