135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2230301)
1. Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography.
Büchi M; Hess OM; Kirkeeide RL; Suter T; Muser M; Osenberg HP; Niederer P; Anliker M; Gould KL; Krayenbühl HP
Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 2230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new method for automatic identification of coronary arteries in standard biplane angiograms.
Yanagihara Y; Hashimoto T; Sugahara T; Sugimoto N
Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Dec; 10(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 7722346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities.
Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometry versus densitometry--a comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries.
Doriot PA; Suilen C; Guggenheim N; Dorsaz PA; Chappuis F; Rutishauser W
Int J Card Imaging; 1992; 8(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1629638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the vasomotility of epicardial coronary arteries with quantitative coronary angiography.
Jost S; Rafflenbeul W; Lichtlen P
Z Kardiol; 1989; 78 Suppl 6():143-8. PubMed ID: 2694662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography.
Theron HD; Lambert CR; Pepine CJ
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1186-90. PubMed ID: 2239720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software.
Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW
Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries.
Doriot PA; Dorsaz PA; Dorsaz L; Chatelain P; Rutishauser W
Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Dec; 12(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 8993991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Morel MA; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2012 Mar; 7(11):1326-35. PubMed ID: 22433196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
Di Mario C; Haase J; den Boer A; Reiber JH; Serruys PW
Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis of coronary arteriograms by microprocessor cinevideodensitometry.
Silver KH; Buczek JA; Esser PD; Nichols AB
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(5):291-300. PubMed ID: 3664626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification.
LeFree MT; Simon SB; Mancini GB; Bates ER; Vogel RA
Invest Radiol; 1988 Mar; 23(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3372175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and precision of quantitative arteriography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. A validation study.
Syvänne M; Nieminen MS; Frick MH
Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Dec; 10(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 7722345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a new quantitative coronary angiography analysis system used to evaluate densitometric lumen remodelling.
Lièvre M; Finet G; Maupas J
Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Feb; 13(1):15-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 9080235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Sanz ML; Mancini J; LeFree MT; Mickelson JK; Starling MR; Vogel RA; Topol EJ
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 60(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2955693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification.
Tommasini G; Rubartelli P; Piaggio M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Dec; 48(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 10559828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
