These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22304533)

  • 1. Important areas of the central binocular visual field for daily functioning in the visually impaired.
    Tabrett DR; Latham K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 22304533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing self-reported vision-related activity limitation in the visually impaired.
    Tabrett DR; Latham K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5293-302. PubMed ID: 21613370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional visual fields: relationship of visual field areas to self-reported function.
    Subhi H; Latham K; Myint J; Crossland MD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 28281282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustment to vision loss in a mixed sample of adults with established visual impairment.
    Tabrett DR; Latham K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7227-34. PubMed ID: 23010637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2810-5. PubMed ID: 16043854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.
    Klein BE; Moss SE; Klein R; Lee KE; Cruickshanks KJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):644-50. PubMed ID: 12689880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient awareness of binocular central scotoma in age-related macular degeneration.
    Fletcher DC; Schuchard RA; Renninger LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1395-8. PubMed ID: 22863789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
    Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.
    Rubin GS; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3327-34. PubMed ID: 11006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rehabilitation of reading and visual exploration in visual field disorders: transfer or specificity?
    Schuett S; Heywood CA; Kentridge RW; Dauner R; Zihl J
    Brain; 2012 Mar; 135(Pt 3):912-21. PubMed ID: 22307201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self-reported visual function in the adult population in Finland.
    Laitinen A; Koskinen S; Härkänen T; Reunanen A; Laatikainen L; Aromaa A
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2227-37. PubMed ID: 16325714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional visual fields: a cross-sectional UK study to determine which visual field paradigms best reflect difficulty with mobility function.
    Subhi H; Latham K; Myint J; Crossland M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018831. PubMed ID: 29162576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma and quality of life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation.
    Freeman EE; Muñoz B; West SK; Jampel HD; Friedman DS
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17655930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods and baseline data.
    Lorenzana L; Lankaranian D; Dugar J; Mayer J; Palejwala N; Kulkarni K; Warrian K; Boghara Z; Richman J; Wizov S; Spaeth G; Almodin J
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 19353399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma.
    Ishibashi M; Matsumoto C; Hashimoto S; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Numata T; Kusaka S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 103(11):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 30636206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual stabilization of posture in persons with central visual field loss.
    Turano KA; Dagnelie G; Herdman SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1483-91. PubMed ID: 8675390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 21078335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing quality of life in patients with glaucoma using the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire.
    Goldberg I; Clement CI; Chiang TH; Walt JG; Lee LJ; Graham S; Healey PR
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 19142128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):387-93. PubMed ID: 22167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.