443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22304742)
1. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations.
Li YQ; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22304742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of oscillating and rotary cutting instruments with electric and turbine handpieces on tooth preparation surfaces.
Geminiani A; Abdel-Azim T; Ercoli C; Feng C; Meirelles L; Massironi D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24726596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
Ayad MF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different preparation finishing procedures on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-produced restorations: A microcomputed tomography evaluation.
Tamam E; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):605-610. PubMed ID: 34974905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of tooth surface roughness on marginal seating and retention of complete metal crowns.
Tuntiprawon M
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9922426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the cutting efficiency of different types of dental diamond rotary instrument with repeated cuts and disinfection.
Bae JH; Yi J; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 24231434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns.
Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 19961993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supplementing retention through crown/preparation modification: an in vitro study.
O'Kray H; Marshall TS; Braun TM
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22385695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective study of pulpal response in vital adult teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed using only air coolant.
Lockard MW
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 12473995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
Atlas AM; Janyavula S; Elsabee R; Alper E; Isleem WF; Bergler M; Setzer FC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35643825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
