BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22304784)

  • 1. Discrimination of gender-, speed-, and shoe-dependent movement patterns in runners using full-body kinematics.
    Maurer C; Federolf P; von Tscharner V; Stirling L; Nigg BM
    Gait Posture; 2012 May; 36(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 22304784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity kinematics during running.
    Nigg BM; Baltich J; Maurer C; Federolf P
    J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(9):1692-7. PubMed ID: 22507350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A holistic approach to study the temporal variability in gait.
    Federolf P; Tecante K; Nigg B
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1127-32. PubMed ID: 22387120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Running in new and worn shoes: a comparison of three types of cushioning footwear.
    Kong PW; Candelaria NG; Smith DR
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 18801775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on the biomechanics of running shoes.
    Hagen M; Hennig EM
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Feb; 27(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 19156560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run.
    Butler RJ; Hamill J; Davis I
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 17055729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining functional groups based on running kinematics using Self-Organizing Maps and Support Vector Machines.
    Hoerzer S; von Tscharner V; Jacob C; Nigg BM
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2072-9. PubMed ID: 25869722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do intermediate- and higher-order principal components contain useful information to detect subtle changes in lower extremity biomechanics during running?
    Phinyomark A; Hettinga BA; Osis S; Ferber R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Dec; 44():91-101. PubMed ID: 26340274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.
    Dixon SJ
    Ergonomics; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 18803091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in running kinematics and kinetics in response to a rockered shoe intervention.
    Boyer KA; Andriacchi TP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):872-6. PubMed ID: 19744753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Nigg BM; De Boer RW; Fisher V
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 7898346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking.
    Lohman EB; Balan Sackiriyas KS; Swen RW
    Phys Ther Sport; 2011 Nov; 12(4):151-63. PubMed ID: 22085708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Footwear Effects from Principal Features of Plantar Loading during Running.
    Trudeau MB; von Tscharner V; Vienneau J; Hoerzer S; Nigg BM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Sep; 47(9):1988-96. PubMed ID: 25628177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of gait sandals for measuring rearfoot and shank motion during running.
    Barnes A; Wheat J; Milner CE
    Gait Posture; 2010 May; 32(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 20363630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical implications of the negative heel rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics.
    Myers KA; Long JT; Klein JP; Wertsch JJ; Janisse D; Harris GF
    Gait Posture; 2006 Nov; 24(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 16300949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces.
    Chumanov ES; Wall-Scheffler C; Heiderscheit BC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1260-8. PubMed ID: 18774631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treadmill versus field trial. Movement analysis and pressure distribution in the athletic shoe].
    Reinisch M; Schaff P; Hauser W; Rosemeyer B
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 1991 Jun; 5(2):60-73. PubMed ID: 1925926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady and transient coordination structures of walking and running.
    Lamoth CJ; Daffertshofer A; Huys R; Beek PJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Jun; 28(3):371-86. PubMed ID: 19027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wearing the F-Scan mobile in-shoe pressure measurement system alters gait characteristics during running.
    Kong PW; De Heer H
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jan; 29(1):143-5. PubMed ID: 18621533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.