237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22304946)
1. Minimizing radiation dose for coronary CT angiography.
Vorobiof G; Achenbach S; Narula J
Cardiol Clin; 2012 Feb; 30(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 22304946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography.
Ketelsen D; Thomas C; Werner M; Luetkhoff MH; Buchgeister M; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Burgstahler C; Brodoefel H; Kopp AF; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 19097836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing radiation dose in CT angiography with wide-detector and single-heart beat acquisition.
Mahesh M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):262-3. PubMed ID: 19577216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MDCT technique reduces dose.
Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):77. PubMed ID: 19738190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography.
Efstathopoulos EP; Kelekis NL; Pantos I; Brountzos E; Argentos S; Grebác J; Ziaka D; Katritsis DG; Seimenis I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):5209-22. PubMed ID: 19671974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient radiation doses in cardiac computed tomography: comparison of published results with prospective and retrospective acquisition.
Efstathopoulos EP; Pantos I; Thalassinou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL; Zografos T; Panayiotakis G; Katritsis DG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21324959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient radiation dose in prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography and retrospectively gated helical technique with a 320-detector row CT scanner.
Seguchi S; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Fujii K; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5579-85. PubMed ID: 21158269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT radiation dose and image quality.
Payne JT
Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of radiation exposure of retrospective gated and prospective triggered 128-slice triple-rule-out CT angiography.
Ketelsen D; Fenchel M; Thomas C; Buchgeister M; Boehringer N; Tsiflikas I; Kaempf M; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):762-6. PubMed ID: 21498316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dose reduction during CT coronary angiography].
Willoteaux S; Sibileau E; Caroff J; Nedelcu C; Abi Kalil W; Delepine S; Thouveny F
J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 91(11 Pt 2):1220-4. PubMed ID: 21178895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners.
Raman SP; Johnson PT; Deshmukh S; Mahesh M; Grant KL; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 23290672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT.
Earls JP
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 19201376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of radiation dose reduction in cardiac computed tomographic angiography.
Entrikin DW; Leipsic JA; Carr JJ
Cardiol Rev; 2011; 19(4):163-76. PubMed ID: 21646870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in radiation protection in CT: present and future status.
Bischoff B; Hein F; Meyer T; Hadamitzky M; Martinoff S; Schömig A; Hausleiter J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3 Suppl 2():S65-73. PubMed ID: 20129519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT equipment and performance issues: radiation protection 162.
Edyvean S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23188810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.
Alkadhi H; Leschka S
Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):505-9. PubMed ID: 20957482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
