These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22305538)

  • 1. Effects of draw solutions and membrane conditions on electricity generation and water flux in osmotic microbial fuel cells.
    Ge Z; He Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Apr; 109():70-6. PubMed ID: 22305538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating forward osmosis into microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment, water extraction and bioelectricity generation.
    Zhang F; Brastad KS; He Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6690-6. PubMed ID: 21751820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding electricity generation in osmotic microbial fuel cells through integrated experimental investigation and mathematical modeling.
    Qin M; Ping Q; Lu Y; Abu-Reesh IM; He Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():194-201. PubMed ID: 26091574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production of electricity and water in an osmotic microbial fuel cell by using EDTA-Na
    Wang Z; Wu S; He Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 677():382-389. PubMed ID: 31059881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of current generation and electrolyte pH on reverse salt flux across thin film composite membrane in osmotic microbial fuel cells.
    Qin M; Abu-Reesh IM; He Z
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():583-590. PubMed ID: 27693970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary study of osmotic membrane bioreactor: effects of draw solution on water flux and air scouring on fouling.
    Qin JJ; Kekre KA; Oo MH; Tao G; Lay CL; Lew CH; Cornelissen ER; Ruiken CJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 20861550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
    She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saline catholytes as alternatives to phosphate buffers in microbial fuel cells.
    Ahn Y; Logan BE
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Mar; 132():436-9. PubMed ID: 23433978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental study of a 4040 spiral-wound forward-osmosis membrane module.
    Kim YC; Park SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(18):7737-45. PubMed ID: 21842852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of draw solutes on an integrated forward osmosis-Microbial fuel cell system treating a synthetic wastewater.
    Ferby M; Zou S; He Z
    Water Environ Res; 2022 Nov; 94(11):e10802. PubMed ID: 36333995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
    Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling.
    Wang Y; Wicaksana F; Tang CY; Fane AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7102-9. PubMed ID: 20735033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance.
    Li D; Zhang X; Simon GP; Wang H
    Water Res; 2013 Jan; 47(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23103058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
    Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The application of forward osmosis for simulated surface water treatment by using trisodium citrate as draw solute.
    Yang S; Gao B; Zhao P; Wang C; Shen X; Yue Q; Shon HK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8585-8593. PubMed ID: 30710329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Membrane cleaning and performance insight of osmotic microbial fuel cell.
    Xue W; He Y; Yumunthama S; Udomkittayachai N; Hu Y; Tabucanon AS; Zhang X; Kurniawan TA
    Chemosphere; 2021 Dec; 285():131549. PubMed ID: 34710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scale-up of osmotic membrane bioreactors by modeling salt accumulation and draw solution dilution using hollow-fiber membrane characteristics and operation conditions.
    Kim S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():88-95. PubMed ID: 24746768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
    Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of humic acid fouling on membrane performance and transport of pharmaceutically active compounds in forward osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4567-75. PubMed ID: 23764606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.