These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22305662)
1. Research ethics board approval for an international thromboprophylaxis trial. Lutz K; Wilton K; Zytaruk N; Julien L; Hall R; Harvey J; Skrobik Y; Vlahakis N; Meade L; Matte A; Meade M; Burns K; Albert M; Cash BB; Vallance S; Klinger J; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D; J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22305662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Post-trial period surveillance for randomised controlled cardiovascular studies: submitted protocols, consent forms and the role of the ethics board. Zia MI; Heslegrave R; Newton GE J Med Ethics; 2011 Dec; 37(12):762-5. PubMed ID: 21700724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure to report and provide commentary on research ethics board approval and informed consent in medical journals. Finlay KA; Fernandez CV J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):761-4. PubMed ID: 18827111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues in the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial. NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group AIDS; 2007 Apr; 21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S69-80. PubMed ID: 17413266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency. Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way? Gold JL; Dewa CS Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):291-307. PubMed ID: 15663714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies. Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigating the institutional review board approval process in a multicenter observational critical care study. Polito CC; Cribbs SK; Martin GS; O'Keeffe T; Herr D; Rice TW; Sevransky JE Crit Care Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1105-9. PubMed ID: 24368345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies. Marsolo K Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S77-81. PubMed ID: 22692264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Site Variability in Regulatory Oversight for an International Study of Pediatric Sepsis. Michelson KN; Reubenson G; Weiss SL; Fitzgerald JC; Ackerman KK; Christie L; Bush JL; Nadkarni VM; Thomas NJ; Schreiner MS; Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2018 Apr; 19(4):e180-e188. PubMed ID: 29377867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canadian research ethics board members' attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials. Cook K; Snyder J; Calvert J BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):84. PubMed ID: 26630936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rates and determinants of informed consent: a case study of an international thromboprophylaxis trial. Smith OM; McDonald E; Zytaruk N; Foster D; Matte A; Clarke F; Meade L; O'Callaghan N; Vallance S; Galt P; Rajbhandari D; Rocha M; Mehta S; Ferguson ND; Hall R; Fowler R; Burns K; Qushmaq I; Ostermann M; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D; ; ; ; J Crit Care; 2013 Feb; 28(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 23089679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials]. Evers JL Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial. Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP; J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS. Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process]. van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective. Ezzat H; Ross S; von Dadelszen P; Morris T; Liston R; Magee LA; BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Jul; 10():223. PubMed ID: 20673343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Klitzman R Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]