These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22306140)

  • 1. Testing the test: an analysis of the MRCGP Applied Knowledge Test as an assessment tool.
    Metcalfe NH
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Jan; 23(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22306140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.
    Wakeford R; Ludka K; Woolf K; McManus IC
    BMC Med; 2018 Dec; 16(1):230. PubMed ID: 30522486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance of the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT) of the MRCGP examination - an immediate post-test questionnaire evaluation of the candidates' views.
    Dixon H; Blow C; Milne P; Siriwardena N; Milne H; Elfes C
    Educ Prim Care; 2015 Jul; 26(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 26253057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment: an integrative review of evidence.
    McLoughlin K; Pope L; Walsh E; Jennings A; Foley T
    Educ Prim Care; 2018 May; 29(3):132-137. PubMed ID: 29366383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PLAB and UK graduates' performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study.
    McManus IC; Wakeford R
    BMJ; 2014 Apr; 348():g2621. PubMed ID: 24742473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can we redesign the MRCGP assessment to support lifelong learning?
    Harrison C
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 30616466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring reasons for differences in performance between UK and international medical graduates in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners Applied Knowledge Test: a cognitive interview study.
    Pattinson J; Blow C; Sinha B; Siriwardena A
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e030341. PubMed ID: 31152046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development.
    van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Scheele F; Driessen EW; Hodges B
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):703-19. PubMed ID: 20510653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of non-pretested versus pretested questions in the applied knowledge test (AKT) of the MRCGP: evidence of quality assurance.
    Dixon H; Blow C; Milne P; Siriwardena N
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 May; 25(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25198471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the potential uses of value-added metrics in the context of postgraduate medical education.
    Gregory S; Patterson F; Baron H; Knight A; Walsh K; Irish B; Thomas S
    Med Teach; 2016 Oct; 38(10):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 27071643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do general practice selection scores predict success at MRCGP? An exploratory study.
    Ahmed H; Rhydderch M; Matthews P
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Mar; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 22449464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formative assessment of GP trainees' clinical skills.
    Wiener-Ogilvie S; Begg D
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Mar; 23(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 22449465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP(UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity.
    Wakeford R; Denney M; Ludka-Stempien K; Dacre J; McManus IC
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 25592199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of clinical simulations in assessment.
    Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2003 Nov; 37 Suppl 1():65-71. PubMed ID: 14641641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.
    Siriwardena AN; Edwards AG; Campion P; Freeman A; Elwyn G
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):857-62. PubMed ID: 17132353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is being assessed in the MRCGP oral examination? A qualitative study.
    Simpson RG; Ballard KD
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jun; 55(515):430-6. PubMed ID: 15970066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of child actors to simulate paediatric patients in the MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA): developing an effective model.
    Russell D; Simpson R; Eden M; Foreman P
    Educ Prim Care; 2015 Jul; 26(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 26253060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving oral examinations: selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Royal College of General Practitioners.
    Wakeford R; Southgate L; Wass V
    BMJ; 1995 Oct; 311(7010):931-5. PubMed ID: 7580556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer feedback for examiner quality assurance on MRCGP International South Asia: a mixed methods study.
    Perera DP; Andrades M; Wass V
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 29221450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners.
    Rousselot N; Tombrey T; Zongo D; Mouillet E; Joseph JP; Gay B; Salmi LR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):254. PubMed ID: 30413196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.