These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22306372)

  • 1. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review.
    Kim Y; Beets MW; Welk GJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Jul; 15(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22306372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth.
    Zhu Z; Chen P; Zhuang J
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth.
    Trost SG; Loprinzi PD; Moore R; Pfeiffer KA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jul; 43(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 21131873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2-3 year olds.
    Costa S; Barber SE; Cameron N; Clemes SA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Nov; 17(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 24365695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents.
    Romanzini M; Petroski EL; Ohara D; Dourado AC; Reichert FF
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24533499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration and validation of physical behaviour cut-points using wrist-worn ActiGraphs for children and adolescents: A systematic review.
    Clanchy K; Stanfield M; Smits E; Liimatainen J; Ritchie C
    J Sci Med Sport; 2024 Feb; 27(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 38087661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.
    McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children.
    van Cauwenberghe E; Labarque V; Trost SG; de Bourdeaudhuij I; Cardon G
    Int J Pediatr Obes; 2011 Jun; 6(2-2):e582-9. PubMed ID: 21121867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration and Cross-Validation of the ActiGraph wGT3X+ Accelerometer for the Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.
    McGarty AM; Penpraze V; Melville CA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164928. PubMed ID: 27760219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving Forward with Backward Compatibility: Translating Wrist Accelerometer Data.
    Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Fairclough SJ; Boddy LM; Olds TS; Parfitt G; Noonan RJ; Downs SJ; Knowles ZR; Beets MW
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Nov; 48(11):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 27327029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maturity negates the gender-related difference in physical activity among youth. Is this equally justified whatever the accelerometer cut-off point used?
    Zitouni D; Guinhouya BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Jul; 15(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 22188848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children.
    Pate RR; Almeida MJ; McIver KL; Pfeiffer KA; Dowda M
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2000-6. PubMed ID: 17135617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
    Hänggi JM; Phillips LR; Rowlands AV
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ability of RT3 accelerometer cut points to detect physical activity intensity in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy.
    Ryan J; Walsh M; Gormley J
    Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2014 Oct; 31(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 25211479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children.
    Mattocks C; Leary S; Ness A; Deere K; Saunders J; Tilling K; Kirkby J; Blair SN; Riddoch C
    Int J Pediatr Obes; 2007; 2(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 17852552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of accelerometry in ambulatory children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
    Clanchy KM; Tweedy SM; Boyd RN; Trost SG
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Dec; 111(12):2951-9. PubMed ID: 21442163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adolescent physical activity levels: discrepancies with accelerometer data analysis.
    Logan GR; Duncan S; Harris NK; Hinckson EA; Schofield G
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Nov; 34(21):2047-53. PubMed ID: 26890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibration of the biotrainer pro activity monitor in children.
    Welk GJ; Eisenmann JC; Schaben J; Trost SG; Dale D
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2007 May; 19(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 17603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intensity-based cut-points for the RT3 accelerometer in youth.
    Joschtel BJ; Trost SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 24262335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.