134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22306698)
21. Effects of sequential artificial tear and cyclosporine emulsion therapy on conjunctival goblet cell density and transforming growth factor-beta2 production.
Pflugfelder SC; De Paiva CS; Villarreal AL; Stern ME
Cornea; 2008 Jan; 27(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 18245969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Conjunctival impression cytology in patients with normal and impaired OSDI scores].
Zuazo F; López-Ponce D; Salinas-Toro D; Valenzuela F; Sans-Puroja J; Srur M; López-Solís RO; Traipe-Castro L
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Oct; 89(10):391-6. PubMed ID: 24993073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of nucleus-to-cell and nucleus-to-cytoplasm calculations for conjunctival impression cytology specimens.
Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jul; 37(7):583-91. PubMed ID: 22574637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of gender on the ocular surface.
Connor CG; Flockencier LL; Hall CW
J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Mar; 70(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 10457693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of goblet cell orifice distribution across the rabbit bulbar conjunctiva based on numerical density and nearest neighbors analysis.
Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2013 Feb; 38(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 23327688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology.
Doughty MJ; Naase T
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Jun; 31(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 18258477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality.
Lievens CW; Connor CG; Murphy H
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 14555901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Grid-Based Nucleus Counting Method for Estimates of the Density of Superficial Conjunctival Cells from Impression Cytology Samples Taken from Normal Healthy Human Eyes.
Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Sep; 42(9):1228-1234. PubMed ID: 28557568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology.
Aragona P; Ferreri G; Micali A; Puzzolo D
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 3a)():461-6. PubMed ID: 9775250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Objective assessment of contact lens wear-associated conjunctival squamous metaplasia by linear measures of cell size, shape and nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios.
Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Jul; 36(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 21599455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Research on effects of vitamin A palmitate on repair of mechanical corneal epithelial defects and conjunctival goblet cells in rabbits].
Qiu XD; Gong L; Chen MJ
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 46(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 20388350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Further analysis of the size and shape of cells obtained by impression cytology from the exposed portion of the human bulbar conjunctiva.
Doughty MJ; Blades K; Button NF; Wilson G
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Sep; 20(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 11045248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva in contact lens wear.
Efron N; Al-Dossari M; Pritchard N
Cornea; 2010 Jan; 29(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 19907292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conjunctival impression cytology changes induced by oral isotretinoin.
de Queiroga IB; Antônio Vieira L; Barros Jde N; Melo Diniz Mde F; de Morais LC
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):1009-13. PubMed ID: 19724211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of goblet cell density after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome in LASIK.
Rodriguez AE; Rodriguez-Prats JL; Hamdi IM; Galal A; Awadalla M; Alio JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2570-5. PubMed ID: 17525186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface.
Cakmak SS; Unlü MK; Karaca C; Nergiz Y; Ipek S
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 14555898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers.
Simon P; Jaison SG; Chopra SK; Jacob S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 50(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 12532495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of grading schemes to quantitative assessments of nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratios for human bulbar conjunctival cells collected by impression cytology.
Blades KJ; Doughty MJ
Curr Eye Res; 2000 Apr; 20(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 10806448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Distribution of goblet cells and MUC5AC mRNA in the canine nictitating membrane.
Umeda Y; Nakamura S; Fujiki K; Toshida H; Saito A; Murakami A
Exp Eye Res; 2010 Nov; 91(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 20804752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Density and distribution of canine conjunctival goblet cells.
Moore CP; Wilsman NJ; Nordheim EV; Majors LJ; Collier LL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Dec; 28(12):1925-32. PubMed ID: 3679745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
