These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22307469)
1. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay. Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes of totally implantable venous access port placement via the axillary vein in patients with head and neck malignancy. Hong S; Seo TS; Song MG; Seol HY; Suh SI; Ryoo IS J Vasc Access; 2019 Mar; 20(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 29923460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripherally inserted central catheters in the treatment of children with cancer: Results of a multicenter study. Rykov MY; Zaborovskij SV; Shvecov AN; Shukin VV J Vasc Access; 2018 Jul; 19(4):378-381. PubMed ID: 29546772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer. Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A single-incision technique for placement of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein. Seo TS; Song MG; Kang EY; Lee CH; Yong HS; Doo K J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 24613268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience. Charvát J; Linke Z; Horáèková M; Prausová J Support Care Cancer; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1162-5. PubMed ID: 16596418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications. Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours. Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of catheter diameter on left innominate vein in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement. Song MG; Seo TS; Kim YH; Cho SB; Chung HH; Lee SH; Jung E J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 29560786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Innominate vein stenosis in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement. Song MG; Seo TS; Kang EY; Yong HS; Seo JH; Choi YY J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25953212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Centrally inserted tunnelled peripherally inserted central catheter: Off-label use for venous access in oncology patients. Lingegowda D; Gehani A; Sen S; Mukhopadhyay S; Ghosh P J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):773-777. PubMed ID: 32133909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors that predict increased catheter tip movement in left internal jugular vein implantable venous access ports upon standing. Wallace JA; Afonso E; Yu H; Birchard K; Isaacson A J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 25613147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management. Poletti F; Coccino C; Monolo D; Crespi P; Ciccioli G; Cordio G; Seveso G; De Servi S J Vasc Access; 2018 Sep; 19(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 29514546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications. Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center. Ahn SJ; Kim HC; Chung JW; An SB; Yin YH; Jae HJ; Park JH Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 22563269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison Between Upper Arm and Chest for Optimal Site of Totally Implanted Venous Access Ports in Patients with Female Breast Cancer. Yang SS; Ahn MS Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():128-134. PubMed ID: 29481918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External jugular vein cross-over as a new technique for percutaneous central venous port access in case of left central venous occlusion. Marcy PY; El Hajjam M; Lacout A; Nöel C; Simon JJ; Figl A J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(4):388-91. PubMed ID: 23817955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractures of totally implantable central venous ports: more than fortuity. A three-year single center experience. Balsorano P; Galducci G; De Fanti I; Evans SK; De Gaudio AR; Pelagatti C J Vasc Access; 2014; 15(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 25041921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]