These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22307862)

  • 1. Prosthetic limb sockets from plant-based composite materials.
    Campbell AI; Sexton S; Schaschke CJ; Kinsman H; McLaughlin B; Boyle M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 22307862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static strength of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: An exploratory study on the influence of stratigraphy, distal adapter and lamination resin.
    Gariboldi F; Scapinello M; Petrone N; Migliore GL; Teti G; Cutti AG
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Apr; 114():103970. PubMed ID: 37030898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile strength and impact resistance properties of materials used in prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets.
    Gerschutz MJ; Haynes ML; Nixon DM; Colvin JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(8):987-1004. PubMed ID: 22068374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short glass fiber-reinforced composite with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix for temporary crowns and bridges.
    Garoushi SK; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18176644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding of light-cured glass ionomer cement to polycarbonate resin treated with experimental primers.
    Fujita N; Itoh T; Matsumoto M; Caputo AA
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 11036995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Static structural testing of trans-tibial composite sockets.
    Current TA; Kogler GF; Barth DG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 10493138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength between resin composite and etched and non-etched glass ionomer.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Ishikiriama A; da Silva e Souza Júnior MH; Delazari RC
    Braz Dent J; 1997; 8(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9590929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength of secondary-cured resin composite inlay repairs.
    Davies BR; Millar BJ; Wood DJ; Bubb NL
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jun; 28(6):415-8. PubMed ID: 9477907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of temperature on unpolymerized composite resin film thickness.
    Blalock JS; Holmes RG; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 17174660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Load bearing capacity of fibre-reinforced and particulate filler composite resin combination.
    Garoushi S; Lassila LV; Tezvergil A; Vallittu PK
    J Dent; 2006 Mar; 34(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 16150524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexure strength evaluation of a laboratory-processed fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Al-Darwish M; Hurley RK; Drummond JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 17547944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.