These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2230821)

  • 1. A comparative study of uncemented tibial components.
    Walker PS; Hsu HP; Zimmerman RA
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Sep; 5(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 2230821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of knee component alignment on tibial load distribution with clinical correlation.
    Hsu HP; Garg A; Walker PS; Spector M; Ewald FC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):135-44. PubMed ID: 2805471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design.
    Lonner JH; Klotz M; Levitz C; Lotke PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan; 16(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 11172279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inducible displacement of a trabecular metal tibial monoblock component.
    Wilson DA; Astephen JL; Hennigar AW; Dunbar MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 19689934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knee joint kinematics, fixation and function related to joint area design in total knee arthroplasty.
    Uvehammer J
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2001 Feb; 72(299):1-52. PubMed ID: 11381581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary stability of tibial plateaus under dynamic compression-shear loading in human tibiae - Influence of keel length, cementation area and tibial stem.
    Grupp TM; Saleh KJ; Holderied M; Pfaff AM; Schilling C; Schroeder C; Mihalko WM
    J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():9-22. PubMed ID: 28602471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty.
    Stern SH; Wills RD; Gilbert JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):44-52. PubMed ID: 9418620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of tibial component malalignment on bone strain in revision total knee replacement.
    Rastetter BR; Wright SJ; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Clift SE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 27006420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques.
    Peters CL; Craig MA; Mohr RA; Bachus KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):158-68. PubMed ID: 12671498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Addition of a short central extension to surface cemented tibial trays in primary TKA: an in vitro study of the effect on initial fixation stability and its relationship to supporting bone density.
    Pérez-Blanca A; Prado M; Ezquerro F; Montañéz E; Espejo A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 18171597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rigidity of initial fixation with uncemented tibial knee implants.
    Branson PJ; Steege JW; Wixson RL; Lewis J; Stulberg SD
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2926405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the design of tibial components and stems in knee replacement.
    Scott CE; Biant LC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1009-15. PubMed ID: 22844039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement.
    Chong DY; Hansen UN; van der Venne R; Verdonschot N; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):948-54. PubMed ID: 21236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fixation technique on displacement incompatibilities at the bone-implant interface in cementless total knee replacement in a canine model.
    Berzins A; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Natarajan R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8580542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of a pegged tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Miller CW; Pettygrow R
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan; 16(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11172273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up.
    Small SR; Ritter MA; Merchun JG; Davis KE; Rogge RD
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):911-6. PubMed ID: 23814242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions.
    Chong DY; Hansen UN; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2010 Apr; 43(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 20189576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Micromotion of cementless tibial baseplates under physiological loading conditions.
    Bhimji S; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):648-54. PubMed ID: 21831575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB.
    Hyldahl H; Regnér L; Carlsson L; Kärrholm J; Weidenhielm L
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 16470428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.