These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22308888)
1. Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Cain MS; Mitroff SR Perception; 2011; 40(10):1183-92. PubMed ID: 22308888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Minear M; Brasher F; McCurdy M; Lewis J; Younggren A Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1274-81. PubMed ID: 23722949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Media multitasking and implicit learning. Edwards KS; Shin M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1535-1549. PubMed ID: 28462484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Uncapher MR; K Thieu M; Wagner AD Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 26223469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture. Soto D; Humphreys GW Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Burnham BR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Lavie N; De Fockert J Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 16447380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision-making, cognitive functions, impulsivity, and media multitasking expectancies in high versus low media multitaskers. Müller SM; Schiebener J; Brand M; Liebherr M Cogn Process; 2021 Nov; 22(4):593-607. PubMed ID: 34047893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Wienrich C; Janczyk M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction. Swallow KM; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection. Mast F; Frings C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations? Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects. Makovski T; Jiang YV Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 18927031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. White bear everywhere: exploring the boundaries of the attentional white bear phenomenon. Lahav A; Makovski T; Tsal Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):661-73. PubMed ID: 22323061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging. Aschenbrenner AJ; Balota DA Psychol Aging; 2017 Feb; 32(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 28182494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]