These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22308897)
1. Preference for symmetry: only on mars? Shepherd K; Bar M Perception; 2011; 40(10):1254-6. PubMed ID: 22308897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual cortex activation predicts visual preference: Evidence from Britain and Egypt. Makin AD; Helmy M; Bertamini M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 28697673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cognitive basis for the development of aesthetic preference: Findings from symmetry preference. Huang Y; Lyu J; Xue X; Peng K PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239973. PubMed ID: 33045015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Little AC; Jones BC Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Sep; 270(1526):1759-63. PubMed ID: 12964976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry. Samuels CA; Butterworth G; Roberts T; Graupner L; Hole G Perception; 2013; 42(11):1244-52. PubMed ID: 24601036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of symmetry on children's judgments of facial attractiveness. Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D Perception; 2013; 42(3):302-20. PubMed ID: 23837207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces. Griffey JA; Little AC Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24351988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in neural mechanisms underlying implicit symmetry processing. Lux S; Marshall JC; Neufang S; Fink GR Cortex; 2006 Aug; 42(6):963-9. PubMed ID: 17131602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aesthetic preference in dextrals and sinistrals. McLaughlin JP; Dean P; Stanley P Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 6866256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Looking time predicts choice but not aesthetic value. Isham EA; Geng JJ PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71698. PubMed ID: 23977115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 19394585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect. Sarri M; Greenwood R; Kalra L; Driver J Cortex; 2011 Mar; 47(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 20171612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception. Little AC; Jones BC Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Dec; 273(1605):3093-9. PubMed ID: 17015348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation. Huhn JM; Schimpf KA; van der Wel RP Exp Brain Res; 2014 Dec; 232(12):3919-27. PubMed ID: 25160868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial symmetry detection ability changes across the menstrual cycle. Oinonen KA; Mazmanian D Biol Psychol; 2007 May; 75(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 17316956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The pleasantness of visual symmetry: always, never or sometimes. Pecchinenda A; Bertamini M; Makin AD; Ruta N PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92685. PubMed ID: 24658112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Birds of a feather... Generalization of facial structures following massive familiarization. Tinio PP; Gerger G; Leder H Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 24076329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]